The breeding population of British leopard and mountain lion will prey upon them.
He, along with F.W Holliday thought that the LNM was a literal dragon, an evil, supernatural monster.I thought you exorcise demons.
Well, Nessie hasn't eaten anyone since the exorcism, so it clearly worked.Reverend Dr Donald Omand exorsicing the Loch Ness Monster on Nationwide in 1973. That's F.W Holliday, author of The Dragon and The Disc with him.
Only the fat onesI thought you exorcise demons.
This has echoes of St Columba's encounter with the LNM.Reverend Dr Donald Omand exorsicing the Loch Ness Monster on Nationwide in 1973. That's F.W Holliday, author of The Dragon and The Disc with him.
There are also many stories of miracles which he performed during his work to convert the Picts, the most famous being his encounter with an unidentified animal that some have equated with the Loch Ness Monster in 565. It is said that he banished a ferocious "water beast" to the depths of the River Ness after it had killed a Pict and then tried to attack Columba's disciple, Lugne.
I'm thinking that he must have banished 'the monster' from 'Loch Linnhe,' the western end of the Ness?This has echoes of St Columba's encounter with the LNM.
From Wikipedia:
Worth watching just to hear, the expression, "Dr Omand, his canonicals fanned by the breeze..."Reverend Dr Donald Omand exorsicing the Loch Ness Monster on Nationwide in 1973. That's F.W Holliday, author of The Dragon and The Disc with him.
He had become convinced that the LNM was an evil dragon. He wend on to tackle a Swedish lake monster. Both are still seen so his rituals failed. There is a very interesting book called Devil Hunter by Marc Alexander about him.Worth watching just to hear, the expression, "Dr Omand, his canonicals fanned by the breeze..."
An interesting assertion by the narrator that the monster has been causing mischief for a million years.
I wonder what makes a recently retired west country vicar decide that he is the one to travel to Scotland and carry out this exorcism in front of the TV cameras. Surely not attention seeking disorder?
3:40 is pretty interesting.More of the photos taken by Chie Kelly have been found:
I looks a bit like a sturgeon and we can see white markings on it's side in one of those close up pictures which sturgeons also have.
Perhaps there is a good reason why, but the background remains at the same angle to the 'frame' of the images as she snapped away with a hand-held camera. Then there is the whole back story about holding onto the photos for "fear of ridicule" and yet now she appears to be courting publicity and also just happens to be a freelance journalist...?! How typical that the best series of photos of 'something' in Loch Ness would be less than straightforward..."Initially thinking that she had only saved 15 photos from the event, Kelly was amazed to find that there were another 56 pictures that wound up not being fully deleted."
https://www.coasttocoastam.com/arti...c-photos-of-mysterious-creature-in-loch-ness/
The more I look at this composite dozens of of still photos the more I think the Loch Ness background has been added at a later date to wherever the river/lake/loch/seawater was.