Not recognizing by doctors, I suffered “Middle Child Syndrome”.
Your birth place will determine your personality down to the way you sleep at nigh.
My older brother was first born and you would think he was “King”.
My younger sister was always my parents’s baby.
Me, well I was just there.
I wonder how it works if there are four siblings?
Would it be 1 against 3 or 2 versus 2 ?
Well, I was the 'baby' of a family of 5 siblings. Two brothers, two sisters all far older than me.
Two perspectives:
My youngest sister (8 years older than me) was expected to babysit me, when she was of an age when she wanted to go out with her friends, have fun etc. Of course, she was bound to resent me. Also, as I was so young I needed more attention than she felt she got
at the same age.
From my point of view, I didn't feel spoiled at all for two reasons - firstly, by the time I was old enough to look after myself, all my brothers and sisters had grown up and moved out to their own homes. Secondly, my parents weren't the 'affectionate' type. For one particular reason (I discovered as a middle-aged man*), my parents while keeping me fed, healthy, and homed, offered me no emotional support or affection. So, while my brothers and sisters always saw me as the spoiled baby, I certainly didn't feel spoiled in the slightest.
* Long story - four years after the birth of my youngest sister, my mum left my dad for another man and she got 'with child'. Things didn't work out and mum wanted to return home. Dad agreed but on the condition that my
half-brother was adopted and never mentioned again. Also, that mum
had to have a child with my dad. In effect, I was a consolation prize. I can't imagine the emotional turmoil they went through - especially since they were of a far older generation - but I'm sure this was why there was no real emotional connection between me and my parents; I was a reminder of a bad time in their marriage.