- Joined
- Aug 7, 2001
- Messages
- 54,631
This story is not about growing old, but it clearly relates to the previous story, and makes some very strong points that ought to be trumpeted aloud:
No more singing policemen
The police keep abdicating their responsibility: to protect us from violent yobs
Martin Samuel
Surveying the wreckage of another family and its surrounding community, Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan, of the Cheshire Constabulary, had no doubt of the way ahead: “I think society is beginning to see the events of today, and the murder of Mr Newlove, as a tipping point where we all have to take action against antisocial behaviour,” he said, sagely.
Not all, Garry. You. Specifically you. You, Garry Shewan, and the officers under your command, have to take action against antisocial behaviour because that is your job. We're done. We're finished. They've got us licked. Garry Newlove tried to take action against antisocial behaviour and he was kicked to death outside his home, as his children watched.
And do you know why? Because it is absolutely impossible for a rational, civilised human being to confront the perpetrators of such a crime, as there is nothing in the mind of the average individual that allows him to challenge such wickedness and violent relish on equal terms. That is why we need law enforcers, with experience and back-up and a mandate to deal with any incident in the manner they see fit. When Mr Newlove was lying on the floor having his brain toed into grisly submission, his horrified family was not looking for society to come around the corner and save him; they were looking for coppers.
Considering that the little gang of human effluence that gathered nightly outside Mr Newlove's house was prepared to commit murder if challenged, then to match the intensity of that blood lust, the 47-year-old sales manager would have had to leave his house armed with a semi-automatic weapon. There were three of them, so he could not have taken them on in a fight or a reasoned discussion, as his death proved. He had previously explored the correct process of involving the police and the local council, but to no effect. Violence and vandalism were endemic in the Station Road North area of Fearnhead in Warrington, to the extent that the community felt under siege. In the ten days before Mr Newlove was murdered, seven local householders were attacked, four on the night that he died.
Just about everything that has passed the lips of the police subsequently has been a mealy-mouthed abdication of responsibility: “Unless we challenge the drinking culture of today,” said Mr Shewan, “this is a tragedy that can happen again and again. We have to send a very strong message that the availability of cheap, strong alcohol is not acceptable.” With this statement, the Assistant Chief Constable involves the Cheshire police in something over which it has no jurisdiction - off-licence sales in the Warrington area - while refusing to admit control over an issue that is entirely its concern - crime committed by known criminals on its watch.
If Cheshire police had put an officer, or two, on duty in Station Road North, just hanging about, breaking up the gangs, identifying troublemakers and dealing with problems as they occurred, Mr Newlove would still be alive. The access to cheap hooch, the absence of parental control, the failings of modern society are all outweighed by that simple fact. Another decent guy is dead because the police found better things to do than protect a vulnerable section of the community.
Mr Newlove had no chance because confronted by such base, compassionless, evil little men, nobody has. In a street fight, while Joe Average is still trying to compute the rules of engagement, whether violence is justified and what the ramifications could be, while he is still trying to overcome feelings of fear and confusion, and adapt to a world in which all the conventions and tenderness of humanity have been abandoned, those who are well versed in violence are stamping on his head until it cracks.
It must be presumed that police officers, although no less decent, are familiar with the territory and better prepared to tackle it. They have the training and the authority of law. Mr Shewan's belief that society will heal itself unaided by the police, therefore, is at best optimistic, and at worst, self-serving and negligent.
The police have lost sight of what matters. On the website of Cheshire police there is a policing plan leaflet headed, “Keeping it local to deliver the service you want”, and beneath it is a picture of grinning bobby miming with an acoustic guitar in a record shop as amused staff look on. This is the service we want, apparently. Not coppers; singers:
“And here he is, all the way from the underpass Fearnhead, please give a warm Warrington welcome to Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan. Good to see you, Garry, and what will you be playing tonight?”
“Well, Jim, I'd like to do a medley of the classics, starting with that old duet, Don't Go Breaking Your Skull, then the Tony Bennett standard I Left My Teeth In San Francisco and finishing with what I'd like to think has become my signature tune, If I Had a Hammer.”
On the website, Inspector Stuart Woodcock, of Warrington South, explains: “The focus these days is more localised with the aim of understanding what the problems are in each neighbourhood, and getting to know the residents as well as the local criminals.” Presumably, given his record, Cheshire police “knew” gang leader Adam Swellings, but did not care enough to make sure he had not returned to his old haunts, to link up with his murdering rabble of toe-rags. Everything that is wrong with modern policing is contained in that one sentence, in which the notions of knowing residents and local criminals are equated. Maybe the inspector could organise a meet-and-greet, to get the communities together. Maybe the singing copper could come along and give everybody a tune.
Or maybe Cheshire police could go back to doing the job, which does not involve knowing murderers but nicking, bullying and frightening them out of their wits. There is a tipping point, all right, but not where the Assistant Chief Constable thinks. If contributory negligence were more than a common law defence, Cheshire police would be beside Mr Newlove's killers in the dock.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 207061.ece
No more singing policemen
The police keep abdicating their responsibility: to protect us from violent yobs
Martin Samuel
Surveying the wreckage of another family and its surrounding community, Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan, of the Cheshire Constabulary, had no doubt of the way ahead: “I think society is beginning to see the events of today, and the murder of Mr Newlove, as a tipping point where we all have to take action against antisocial behaviour,” he said, sagely.
Not all, Garry. You. Specifically you. You, Garry Shewan, and the officers under your command, have to take action against antisocial behaviour because that is your job. We're done. We're finished. They've got us licked. Garry Newlove tried to take action against antisocial behaviour and he was kicked to death outside his home, as his children watched.
And do you know why? Because it is absolutely impossible for a rational, civilised human being to confront the perpetrators of such a crime, as there is nothing in the mind of the average individual that allows him to challenge such wickedness and violent relish on equal terms. That is why we need law enforcers, with experience and back-up and a mandate to deal with any incident in the manner they see fit. When Mr Newlove was lying on the floor having his brain toed into grisly submission, his horrified family was not looking for society to come around the corner and save him; they were looking for coppers.
Considering that the little gang of human effluence that gathered nightly outside Mr Newlove's house was prepared to commit murder if challenged, then to match the intensity of that blood lust, the 47-year-old sales manager would have had to leave his house armed with a semi-automatic weapon. There were three of them, so he could not have taken them on in a fight or a reasoned discussion, as his death proved. He had previously explored the correct process of involving the police and the local council, but to no effect. Violence and vandalism were endemic in the Station Road North area of Fearnhead in Warrington, to the extent that the community felt under siege. In the ten days before Mr Newlove was murdered, seven local householders were attacked, four on the night that he died.
Just about everything that has passed the lips of the police subsequently has been a mealy-mouthed abdication of responsibility: “Unless we challenge the drinking culture of today,” said Mr Shewan, “this is a tragedy that can happen again and again. We have to send a very strong message that the availability of cheap, strong alcohol is not acceptable.” With this statement, the Assistant Chief Constable involves the Cheshire police in something over which it has no jurisdiction - off-licence sales in the Warrington area - while refusing to admit control over an issue that is entirely its concern - crime committed by known criminals on its watch.
If Cheshire police had put an officer, or two, on duty in Station Road North, just hanging about, breaking up the gangs, identifying troublemakers and dealing with problems as they occurred, Mr Newlove would still be alive. The access to cheap hooch, the absence of parental control, the failings of modern society are all outweighed by that simple fact. Another decent guy is dead because the police found better things to do than protect a vulnerable section of the community.
Mr Newlove had no chance because confronted by such base, compassionless, evil little men, nobody has. In a street fight, while Joe Average is still trying to compute the rules of engagement, whether violence is justified and what the ramifications could be, while he is still trying to overcome feelings of fear and confusion, and adapt to a world in which all the conventions and tenderness of humanity have been abandoned, those who are well versed in violence are stamping on his head until it cracks.
It must be presumed that police officers, although no less decent, are familiar with the territory and better prepared to tackle it. They have the training and the authority of law. Mr Shewan's belief that society will heal itself unaided by the police, therefore, is at best optimistic, and at worst, self-serving and negligent.
The police have lost sight of what matters. On the website of Cheshire police there is a policing plan leaflet headed, “Keeping it local to deliver the service you want”, and beneath it is a picture of grinning bobby miming with an acoustic guitar in a record shop as amused staff look on. This is the service we want, apparently. Not coppers; singers:
“And here he is, all the way from the underpass Fearnhead, please give a warm Warrington welcome to Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan. Good to see you, Garry, and what will you be playing tonight?”
“Well, Jim, I'd like to do a medley of the classics, starting with that old duet, Don't Go Breaking Your Skull, then the Tony Bennett standard I Left My Teeth In San Francisco and finishing with what I'd like to think has become my signature tune, If I Had a Hammer.”
On the website, Inspector Stuart Woodcock, of Warrington South, explains: “The focus these days is more localised with the aim of understanding what the problems are in each neighbourhood, and getting to know the residents as well as the local criminals.” Presumably, given his record, Cheshire police “knew” gang leader Adam Swellings, but did not care enough to make sure he had not returned to his old haunts, to link up with his murdering rabble of toe-rags. Everything that is wrong with modern policing is contained in that one sentence, in which the notions of knowing residents and local criminals are equated. Maybe the inspector could organise a meet-and-greet, to get the communities together. Maybe the singing copper could come along and give everybody a tune.
Or maybe Cheshire police could go back to doing the job, which does not involve knowing murderers but nicking, bullying and frightening them out of their wits. There is a tipping point, all right, but not where the Assistant Chief Constable thinks. If contributory negligence were more than a common law defence, Cheshire police would be beside Mr Newlove's killers in the dock.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 207061.ece