Jolly Jack said:A German TV was hiding in your chimney and grabbing your balls?
And you say that's not erotic?
Emperor said:you have a German Jeremy Beadle grabbing one's family jewels when you are unaware and then tell me its erotic!!
The Yithian said:Emperor said:you have a German Jeremy Beadle grabbing one's family jewels when you are unaware and then tell me its erotic!!
Did he use the 'little' hand or the normal sized one. The former would make you look more *ahem* 'Masculine'.
I posit a subliminal inadequacy complex...
Jolly Jack said:In response to Throw's dream about the dead-seeming woman rocking the bed, a guy I went to school with once confided in me that he'd been having naughty dreams about Cybill Shepherd.
"Moonlighting" being on tv at the time, that was understandable in a young fella, but the disturbing bit was, in the dream, which he'd had every night for a week, she was dead.
And he kept her in a cupboard.
And she was a bit more decomposed everytime he had the dream.
And he didn't think it odd that he was still turned on enough in his dream to do the business.
And then he'd put her back in the cupboard until the next night.
:nooo: :eek!!!!:
Well, we may really talking about Ariadne here, the Queen of the Spiral Castle, behind the North Wind.Abraxas said:What the hell has a spider got to do with The Morrigan ?????
AndroMan said:As some rude and insensitive skeptics have been pointing out, a great deal of modern paganism is made up on the hoof, drawing upon a variety of sources, ancient and modern, from around the World. That doesn't necessarily make them less valid. One, might see them as being woven together into a silvery, shining web of Moonshine. And why not?
Says you. :lol:PaZZa said:same as any other dream, while you sleep the human mind files and sorts information, the dream is parts of such surfacing.
No mystery, no grand design.
And of course, Belief systems based on Authorative Official Histories of Belief, especially the varieties neatly written down and pressed into special Holy Books, are much more 'real' than personal Belief systems that people have discovered and created for themselves.JerryB said:It depends how much you stir things into an amalgam, which can also be an attempt to rewrite history to suit one's own purposes. Supposed backwards glances to a mythical past also don't help
How do you actually know if a lost past is being re-written? When it comes to spiritual matters of belief, personal revelation is counted at least as important as something written down by a learned historian, or other expert, anyway.JerryB said:That search won't be much cop if it decides to rewrite the past for it's own uses. Otherwise, what use is the past, and why strive to make use of it if only to rewrite it and thus devalue it? Then again, it depends on whether those doing the rewriting acknowledge what they're doing and don't keep up any pretense of following any 'old ways', etc.
Good (and scary) story. Is there any possibility you could have heard the gunshot and it made you start to dream about a gang fight?f3nce said:I had a strangely prophetic dream last night.
boynamedsue said:JerryB said:Not that that will matter one jot to modern 'pagans'...
Meanie. :lol:
AndroMan said:How do you actually know if a lost past is being re-written? When it comes to spiritual matters of belief, personal revelation is counted at least as important as something written down by a learned historian, or other expert, anyway.
Ceiteach The 369thTo396th said:I am interested in knowing if other traditional clans hold her sacred also and what significance such a dream would hold for them. :shock:
The sexuality of Loki is a true expression of his freedom, unhampered as he is by moral paradigms, and also expresses his gender paradox, in that he is inextricably bound to the Feminine, to the dark goddess, both literally, and symbolically. Loki bears the surname Laufeyson, a reference to his mother, not his father, illustrating wherein his power lies, in the Feminine. It also adds weight to the idea that Loki was part of a previous, matricentric culture where descent was matrilineal. Likewise, Kaunaz, the corresponding vulva-shaped rune of Loki, has a feminine polarity.
Loki is a central part of the mysteries of the Dark Goddess, and as such there is a method to his madness, an order to his chaos. While his actions often seem sporadic and unplanned, they are in fact an expression of the Wyrd of the goddess.
Okay.JerryB said:One assumes that modern pagans take their cue about the religious past from history as much as anyone else does. Thus, that is a finite source, and adding anything to it or reworking it is an attempt to change it for a certain purpose. If they don't, the they're making it all up aout of whole cloth - which is fine, as long as there's no attempt to present that belief as something old . . . . .
. . . . or something that has a link or continuity to the past.
Of course they have a link to a 'real past' and of course the past is a constructed artifact. That's the way it works. The problems really start when someone willfully fakes it. That's just like faking an orgasm. Best left to mediæval monks, justifying their abbey's claims to land and the provenance of relics, or the burial place of Arthur and Guinevere.JerryB said:By 'continuity' I meant whether these modern beliefs actually have a link to the real past, or an idealised or invented (modern construct) idea of it. Sure, assimilating from other cultures is a normal thing - but to perhaps imply that this assimilation stems from the distant past may be straying into the realms of modern invention.
JerryB, I think we're starting to post at cross purposes. How 'real' does a belief system have to be to meet your high standards? Admittedly, it's very annoying when one comes across the use of terms like 'celtic' and 'wiccan' in contexts, where they quite obviously do not belong and really are being used erroneously. But, as far as the person using them is concerned, that's what they mean and they may well believe it too.JerryB said:'Of course'? 'Real' in what sense and constructed by whom? Yes, history is a construct - usually an informed one. Things go astray when some decide to amalgamate an imagined or fantasy past with a real one in order to legitimise their own belief system (in this discussion, a modern construction/fantasy).
What you're calling "modern invention" or "construct" a pagan might call "experience". See? It's about belief. If the old gods are real, then their existence is itself the link between modern and ancient manifestations of said gods (spirits/whatevers).JerryB said:- but to perhaps imply that this assimilation stems from the distant past may be straying into the realms of modern invention.