• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

rynner2

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Aug 7, 2001
Messages
54,631
Fancy a new career?

GCHQ challenges code breakers via social networks

UK intelligence agency GCHQ has launched a code cracking competition to help attract new talent.
The organisation has invited potential applicants to solve a visual code posted at an unbranded standalone website.
The challenge will also be "seeded" to social media sites, blogs and forums.

A spokesman said the campaign aimed to raise the profile of GCHQ to an audience that would otherwise be difficult to reach.
"The target audience for this particular campaign is one that may not typically be attracted to traditional advertising methods and may be unaware that GCHQ is recruiting for these kinds of roles," the spokesman said.
"Their skills may be ideally suited to our work and yet they may not understand how they could apply them to a working environment, particularly one where they have the opportunity to contribute so much."

GCHQ said that once the code was cracked individuals would be presented with a keyword to enter into a form field. They would then be redirected to the agency's recruitment website.
The organisation said it was not worried that the problem's answer might be spread around the internet.
It said it would still benefit because the resulting discussion would "generate future recruitment enquiries".

However, it added that anyone who had previously hacked illegally would be ineligible. The agency's website also states that applicants must be British citizens.

The move was hinted at two months ago when Prime Minister David Cameron presented his government's response to the Intelligence and Security Committee's annual report.
The document noted the committee had concerns about GCHQ's "inability to retain a suitable cadre of internet specialists" to respond to cyber threats.
It said that the Cabinet Office supported "initiatives such as the Cyber Security Challenge, which promotes careers in cyber security via annual competitions and events".

Following this the government announced last week that it would set up a specialist department within GCHQ.
The Joint Cyber Unit will concentrate on tackling the growing threat of cyber attacks from organised criminals, terrorists, hostile states and hacktivists.

GCHQ claimed that this was the first time this sort of challenge had ever been conducted by an organisation to target these sorts of skills.

However, the agency has used unusual recruitment methods in the past.
In 2009, it placed video content, themes and downloadable pictures on the Xbox Live network which appeared during Call of Duty, Assassin's Creed and other video games.
Two years earlier, it targeted gamers by placing digital posters in online titles including Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas and Splinter Cell Double Agent.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15968878
 
I've had a look at it, it's hexadecimal code (base 16) but they don't look like ascii values for text.

Anyone got any ideas?

Collectively we could all have a go.
 
What would happen if someone blags the answer but is in actual fact really thick?
 
drbastard said:
What would happen if someone blags the answer but is in actual fact really thick?
I doubt that coming up with the answer would be the only criterion for getting hired! ;)

It would just be the first step on the road to a questionnaire, and then maybe the interview room.
 
Looks like a hex core dump to me. Cracked dozens of 'em back in the day. Stick it in a hex editor and convert to ascii (or ansi) as a first step. (It may not be either of those codes but you'll see patterns better).

But I don't want a job with them (location, not politics) so I can't be bothered myself.
 
I have applied for the job! i didn't actually complete the puzzle, i was linked the webpage after that and went through the application.

I gave a false address but my real mobile number and email cause i figured they would have that anyway, said ye i am a UK citizen , as where my parents and i have just had an email back saying thank you for your application, we will be in touch!! (unlike the Scottish football association when i applied for the Scotland job) :twisted:
 
titch said:
I have applied for the job! i didn't actually complete the puzzle, i was linked the webpage after that and went through the application.

I gave a false address but my real mobile number and email cause i figured they would have that anyway, said ye i am a UK citizen , as where my parents and i have just had an email back saying thank you for your application, we will be in touch!! (unlike the Scottish football association when i applied for the Scotland job) :twisted:

I hope the address you gave them actually exists - the thought of some unsuspecting person opening their post and finding a genuine job application for the intelligence services has put a right smile on my face! They'll probably think they've been hand-picked in secret or something :D
 
I think providing false information to the security services is probably not a good idea.
 
Number_6_uk said:
...I hope the address you gave them actually exists - the thought of some unsuspecting person opening their post and finding a genuine job application for the intelligence services has put a right smile on my face! They'll probably think they've been hand-picked in secret or something :D

Some time ago when apartheid was since going strong in South Africa, I mistakenly opened a letter for the boyfriend of the previous occupant of my flat. (He travelled a lot so he used her address for mail) it was from the South African Bureau for State Security/Buro vir Staatsveiligheid (B.O.S.S.]. I've never returned a letter with "not known here" so quickly....
 
Anome_ said:
I think providing false information to the security services is probably not a good idea.

Their Informants and agents do it all of the time.
 
More likely a classic case of a British balls up. All, no doubt, to the tune of oodles of tax-payers money to create an on-line thingy that can be easily hacked...
 
rynner2 said:
The organisation said it was not worried that the problem's answer might be spread around the internet.
It said it would still benefit because the resulting discussion would "generate future recruitment enquiries".

I hope "attention to detail" isn't in the job requirements ;)
 
And again:

Hackers, code-breakers and job-hunters in general – can you solve this for a chance to become the next Alan Turing?

To most people, it looks like a screen full of random letters. But if you can spot the secrets hidden in the picture above, you could be recruited for a career as a code-breaker.

The Can You Find It competition was launched today by the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) to find the very best mathematicians and ethical hackers to join Britain’s battle against cybercrime.

Those clever enough to complete a cyber treasure hunt breaking a series of codes will also be in with a chance of winning a Google Nexus 7 tablet or a credit card-sized computer called a Raspberry Pi.

The competition, run on behalf of GCHQ by recruitment company TMP Worldwide, gives participants six weeks to hunt down four codes, leading them to various websites before they attempt to unlock the final answer.

Successful code-breakers could then follow in the footsteps of Alan Turing, who led efforts at Bletchley Park cracking codes made by the German Enigma machine during World War 2, defending national security and working with MI5 and MI6.

The roles in question are for ‘curious, tenacious and creative candidates’ who have the intellect, though not necessarily the experience or qualifications, to support the government’s national cyber security agenda, with a salary of between £26,000 and £60,000 depending on skills and experience.

GCHQ’s head of resourcing, Jane Jones, said: ‘The 21st century is confronting us with online threats that are difficult and dangerous, so we want employees who have evolved with the ever-changing digital world and therefore have the right skills to combat these challenges. It’s a puzzle but it’s also a serious test – the jobs on offer here are vital to protecting national security.’

The scheme follows GCHQ’s Can You Crack It? challenge last year, which drew millions to the site and saw 5,000 people apply, with 170 applicants taken forward to be interviewed.

To try your luck, visit www.canyoufindit.co.uk
http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/11/hackers-c ... ng-3958821
 
I have applied for the job! i didn't actually complete the puzzle, i was linked the webpage after that and went through the application.

I gave a false address but my real mobile number and email cause i figured they would have that anyway, said ye i am a UK citizen , as where my parents and i have just had an email back saying thank you for your application, we will be in touch!! (unlike the Scottish football association when i applied for the Scotland job) :twisted:

Did you get the job? Assigned to monitor these Forums?
 
Last edited:
New Director at GCHQ. There's a vacancy at MI5 now.

GCHQ has appointed a female director for the first time in its 104-year history.

Anne Keast-Butler, who is currently serving as deputy director general at MI5, will take up the post running the UK's intelligence service next month. She will succeed Sir Jeremy Fleming who announced in January he would be stepping down after six years.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly described Ms Keast-Butler as the "ideal candidate to lead GCHQ".

Ms Keast-Butler, who had previously worked for GCHQ as the head of counter-terrorism and serious organised crime, said she was "delighted" to become the organisation's 17th director.

Mr Cleverly said Ms Keast-Butler "has an impressive track record at the heart of the UK's national security network, helping to counter threats posed by terrorists, cyber-criminals and malign foreign powers".

The recruitment process was chaired by Cabinet Secretary Simon Case and has been made in agreement with the prime minister.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65240759
 
New Director at GCHQ. There's a vacancy at MI5 now.

GCHQ has appointed a female director for the first time in its 104-year history.

Anne Keast-Butler, who is currently serving as deputy director general at MI5, will take up the post running the UK's intelligence service next month. She will succeed Sir Jeremy Fleming who announced in January he would be stepping down after six years.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly described Ms Keast-Butler as the "ideal candidate to lead GCHQ".

Ms Keast-Butler, who had previously worked for GCHQ as the head of counter-terrorism and serious organised crime, said she was "delighted" to become the organisation's 17th director.

Mr Cleverly said Ms Keast-Butler "has an impressive track record at the heart of the UK's national security network, helping to counter threats posed by terrorists, cyber-criminals and malign foreign powers".

The recruitment process was chaired by Cabinet Secretary Simon Case and has been made in agreement with the prime minister.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65240759
Slightly disappointed that she doesn't look like Judi Dench.
 
Back in ye olde 1980s i did apply for a job at GCHQ and had to turn up and do an aptitude test. Part of it was to create a crossword puzzle. I think. Needless to say, my services were not required. Although, that could be what i want you to believe……..
 
Back in ye olde 1980s i did apply for a job at GCHQ and had to turn up and do an aptitude test. Part of it was to create a crossword puzzle. I think. Needless to say, my services were not required. Although, that could be what i want you to believe……..
:) I was character witness for a close school friend who wanted to join the Foreign Office. Despite that, he got in, and has in fact had a stellar career. He did admit that not long after joining he had a conversation with the spookier side of the diplomatic corps, but they mutually agreed he would not be a good fit. But, as you imply, he would say that, wouldn't he? I did note that for decades he had no social media presence whatsoever... Anyway, given his current, very public-facing, position, I am more inclined to believe him. Diplomacy and spying are basically the same job anyway, just the techniques are slightly different.
 
Back
Top