• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Mummified Dinosaur Reveals Surprises

CarlosTheDJ

CarlosTheDJ

Antediluvian
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
7,001
Location
Pebble Mill
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A partially mummified hadrosaur discovered by a teenager in North Dakota may be the most complete dinosaur ever found, with intact skin that shows evidence of stripes and perhaps soft tissue, researchers said on Monday.

Enough of the animal remains to show it ran quickly and was far more muscular than scientists believed such dinosaurs were.

"It's sort of King Tut meets T. Rex," palaeontologist Phil Manning of the University of Manchester said in a telephone interview.

The creature is fossilized, with the skin and bone turned to stone. But unlike most dinosaur fossils, tissues are preserved as well.

This includes large expanses of the animal's skin, with clear remains of scales.

"This is not a skin impression. This is fossilized skin," Manning said. "When you run your hands over this dinosaur's skin, this is the closest you are going to get to touching a real dinosaur, ever."

The remains of the hadrosaur, dubbed Dakota, were found in 2000 by Tyler Lyson, then 17, on his uncle's ranch in North Dakota.

The hadrosaur, a plant-eating dinosaur that walked on two legs, lived 67 million years ago, during the late Cretaceous Period.

Lyson contacted Manning. The National Geographic Society, which helped pay for the expedition, will air a television program about the team's work on Sunday.

Manning had the team remove the monstrous specimen almost intact, with just the tail in a separate block.

It weighed close to 10,000 pounds.

They persuaded the Boeing Company and NASA to use a huge computed tomography, or CT, scanner in Canoga Park, California, that is usually used to scan space shuttle parts.

LOOKING FOR THE HEAD

The dense fossil has taken months to scan, Manning said. "We will know in the next few days if the head is in there," he said.

The tail piece turned up some surprises. The animal's back end is 25 percent larger than previously thought.

Locomotor biologist Bill Sellers of the University of Manchester used a computer program to reconstruct how the hadrosaur would have moved and came up with a picture of an animal that walked not upright, but with its head low to the ground and forearms almost touching.

The strong muscles connecting its upper legs to its tail would have allowed it to run at speeds of up to 28 miles an hour, well ahead of its predator, Tyrannosaurus rex.

Patterns in the scales resemble those associated with skin colour changes in lizards. This provides the strongest evidence yet that the animal had stripes, Manning said.

The researchers are looking for preserved proteins. They have some results that have been offered to a scientific journal, Manning said.

"It's contentious. We say we are finding soft tissues where people previously have not looked," he said.

They also found a second fossil, one that Manning calls the "the hand of doom." The clawed foot belongs to a species of crocodile that may have been dining on Dakota soon after it died in a riverbed.

"It could have crawled up the back passage of the animal, went to get the guts and ended up stuck," Manning said.
Click to expand...

http://tinyurl.com/3446aq
 
CarlosTheDJ said:
"It could have crawled up the back passage of the animal, went to get the guts and ended up stuck," Manning said.
Click to expand...

:shock:

What a bummer, I bet he had the right arse about that.
 
We can always count on Heck to add a note of scientific importance! :)
 
This cropped up in Quora today.
I didn't even realise that mummified dinos existed!

The Edmontosaurus found in 1908 was initially thought to be the body of a recently dead horse:

dino1.JPG


And this Nodosaurus was so well preserved that its final meal could be identified:

dino2.JPG



https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-mummified-dinosaurs-discovered
 
I still find it hard to reconcile that mummified Nodosaur with the dinosaurs being so ancient. It just seems too odd.
 
It probably has the advantage that a lot of the skin consisted of bone even when it was alive.
 
Xanatic* said:
I still find it hard to reconcile that mummified Nodosaur with the dinosaurs being so ancient. It just seems too odd.
Click to expand...
There is a great documentary about this dino, but i cant find it online anywhere, i found a a few interesting ones.
One about its discovery.


One about the recovery and cleaning of the speciemen


And a lecture about it

 
Given that natural mummification is defined as the process by which the soft tissue of a deceased person or animal are preserved, without the introduction of chemicals by humans, then the truly remarkable discovery of blood cells and other soft tissue in a T. Rex femur probably deserves a mention here:

blood.JPG


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/

The T. Rex isn't unique though. Soft fibrillar bone tissue was subsequently retrieved from a Triceratops fossil (although, arguably, the term fossil isn't entirely appropriate in these cases).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23414624/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top