• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.
A few years back I bought a little, grey "World Radio" from Tesco. It has 9 Short-Wave Bands, FM, AM & LW.

I would play around with it and try to relive the joys of youthful explorations under the covers with my first trans sister.

Gloria has departed this world, alas. :cry:

I am pleased to see I had the sense to store the little, grey radio without its batteries. Tonight, I could try once again to recapture the oddly comforting feelings of dislocated emptiness which drifted in like a fog-bank from Hilversum, Oslo, Luxembourg and Berlin. :cooll:
 
Last edited:
In an earlier life I was a radio operator in the Army.
I'm presuming you mean British Army, but not RSigs?

And I'm guessing Clansman era?

Has anyone ever heard a numbers station either switch to Morse code or be broadcast in Morse code?
There are (or were) morse numbers stations.

It's very unusual for the same station to change mode from voice to key (or vice versa) during an ongoing transmission. This is for a range of complex (and simple) reasons, and they'd apply whether a numbers station or a conventional utility/government transmission was taking place.

Firstly, the simple. Communication Centre operators tended (or tend) to be either voice or key (when I say key, I'll use that as shorthand for straight morse, paddle morse, and even classic teletype full QWERTY keyboards).

Also, the spot frequencies for morse / data transmissions tend to be seperate (normally lower) than those for voice, within each of the international shortwave bands as set by the ITU. Bands themselves are allocated based upon geography, required coverage/distance, service (eg maritime safety) and there are usually a variety of options to give best performance for a given time of day/year.

Finally, morse (and also data) over radio is not at all the same as voice. It's a narrow interrupted tone for morse, and a wider vaying tone for data. It gets resolved by a receiver in a different way from voice, with special filters and mixers.

Morse will nearly always get through; data can often get through; voice is the most variable mode (I mean over long distances at high frequencies, under poor conditions)
 
A few years back I bought a little, grey "World Radio" from Tesco. It has 9 Short-Wave Bands, FM, AM & LW.

I would play around with it and try to relive the joys of youthful explorations under the covers with my first trans sister.

Gloria has departed this world, alas. :cry:
Sorry to hear about the loss of your sister Gloria. :(
 
I wonder why they used voice so often then, any idea?
 
I wonder why they used voice so often then, any idea?
Less chance of making mistakes, when transcribed by non-experts. Also, it makes an additional statement of projected presence (the message's existence is an extended territoriality).

And remember: the message may not be in the content.
 
Enough mo(u)rning Gloria!

I did take the little grey box to bed with me last night to scan all those promising wavebands.

I did not bother with FM and AM, as I can access them easily on a much more powerful receiver.

I don't think the log is worth transcribing: half of the Short Wave bands contained nothing easily detectable.

There was some Glam Rock, an American political rally and some rapid Spanish yattering about the Turkish situation.

I see that I caught live this horrible performance. I thought it must be karaoke time for the candidates!

It was all a bit underwhelming. I guess Babel has moved onto the Web? :confused:
 
Last edited:
I have not heard the switch over from Voice to CW. I was Just making the point that the option is available if conditions go bad. It was something we often had to do if we were working in the evening and the shortwave conditions were changing.

As this was in the mid Sixties, it was pre - Clansman. The weapon of choice was the 'Larkspur' C11/R210. Until recently I had an R210 receiver. Sadly someone stole it. So my shortwave listening (rare these days) is done via a National Panasonic DR28. This has a BFO (Beat Frequency Oscillator) So it can be used for CW reception.

And I also remember the 'emergency calls' on the BBC.

INT21
 
Last edited:
Until recently I had an R210 receiver
Wow...so, this, but without the transmitter part....
c11l.jpg

I have seen some Larkspur equipment up close. It does all look as if it would've survived WW3 without being damaged. Sorry to hear it was stolen.

That current radio of yours looks like quite a capable beast...

I've used radios like yours (with BFO, but no switchable sidebands) and with practice they're quite capable of receiving signals such as numbers stations (sometimes harder to resolve the speech, when it sounds 'upside-down').
 
Oh, the link wasn't so bad after all. And that is the set.
I converted mine to normal AC mains operation following an item in a radio magazine.

INT21
 
A slight tangent, but an interesting one:

INSIDE THE RUSSIAN SHORT WAVE RADIO ENIGMA

FROM A LONELY rusted tower in a forest north of Moscow, a mysterious shortwave radio station transmitted day and night. For at least the decade leading up to 1992, it broadcast almost nothing but beeps; after that, it switched to buzzes, generally between 21 and 34 per minute, each lasting roughly a second—a nasally foghorn blaring through a crackly ether. The signal was said to emanate from the grounds of a voyenni gorodok (mini military city) near the village of Povarovo, and very rarely, perhaps once every few weeks, the monotony was broken by a male voice reciting brief sequences of numbers and words, often strings of Russian names: “Anna, Nikolai, Ivan, Tatyana, Roman.” But the balance of the airtime was filled by a steady, almost maddening, series of inexplicable tones.

The amplitude and pitch of the buzzing sometimes shifted, and the intervals between tones would fluctuate. Every hour, on the hour, the station would buzz twice, quickly. None of the upheavals that had enveloped Russia in the last decade of the cold war and the first two decades of the post-cold-war era—Mikhail Gorbachev, perestroika, the end of the Afghan war, the Soviet implosion, the end of price controls, Boris Yeltsin, the bombing of parliament, the first Chechen war, the oligarchs, the financial crisis, the second Chechen war, the rise of Putinism—had ever kept UVB-76, as the station’s call sign ran, from its inscrutable purpose. During that time, its broadcast came to transfix a small cadre of shortwave radio enthusiasts, who tuned in and documented nearly every signal it transmitted. Although the Buzzer (as they nicknamed it) had always been an unknown quantity, it was also a reassuring constant, droning on with a dark, metronome-like regularity.

But on June 5, 2010, the buzzing ceased. No announcements, no explanations. Only silence.

The following day, the broadcast resumed as if nothing had happened. For the rest of June and July, UVB-76 behaved more or less as it always had. There were some short-lived perturbations—including bits of what sounded like Morse code—but nothing dramatic. In mid-August, the buzzing stopped again. It resumed, stopped again, started again.

Continued at length:
https://www.wired.com/2011/09/ff_uvb76/
 
2017-04-18
NORTH KOREA SENDS A RADIO BROADCAST OF NEW ENCRYPTED NUMBERS

The North's propaganda station Radio Pyongyang began broadcasting the messages at 1:15 a.m. (Seoul time), calling out a series of pages and numbers, such as No. 69 on page 823, No. 92 on page 467 and No. 100 on page 957, before repeating them one more time.

The radio announcer said, "(I'm) giving review works in elementary information technology lessons of the remote education university for No. 27 expedition agents."

The latest batch of numbers are different from those that have been aired to date. Pyongyang Radio last aired a broadcast of encrypted numbers Sunday.

It marked the 32nd time that Pyongyang has broadcast encrypted numbers since June 2016.

http://swli05639fr.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/north-korea-sends-radio-broadcast-of.html
 
Anyone else think NK are just pretending to have a numbers station and they made their codes up to sound as if they were more internationally competent than they are?
 
Possible.

It has been speculated that the system is no longer in use but the broadcasts have been resumed to convince enemies that operations are afoot.
 
Yeah, other countries that use the SNS don't make such a song and dance about it, probably with good reason. It looks a bit desperate in a "me too!" way.
 
Not all the numbers are spy codes.

Remote Automated Weather Stations (RAWS) are automated sensors scattered across areas with no towns or official weather stations. They transmit temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, rainfall, etc via satellite back to a central computer. Many are also outfitted with voice synthesizers so if you know the right codes you can get the current weather conditions from a station on your smart phone.
 
What better way to wind up the Americans than to get a random number generator,
hook it to a transmitter, then leave it running to just churn out millions of meaningless sets of numbers.
Such fun.

INT21
 
What better way to wind up the Americans than to get a random number generator,
hook it to a transmitter, then leave it running to just churn out millions of meaningless sets of numbers.
Such fun.

INT21
That's probably been the modus operandi behind all of the numbers stations worldwide.
 
Fear-porn. Falteringly-scripted, as well.

Note that the so-called North Koreans are alleged to be 'angry' about the creation of a missile defense shield....

Precisely as they were 9 months ago... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/19/north-korea-radio-broadcast-numbers-code-spies

And as they will be reported as being, again, in another, say 9-12 months. Serial fear-porn.

Remember....these people possess weapons of mass distraction. Definitely. Even without Mr Hans Blix being there to confirm it for us, on behalf of the Untied Notions. And they could be launched at very short notice...
 
Last edited:
They want food and oil from both China and the US. Time they stopped being twats and started acting like a real country.
 
North Korea's human rights record appears to be shocking. It is a real catch 22 situation. Stop treating your own people like shit

Yes. But.....this is highly-improbable, NY Times reporting, here:

But the world owes it to the North Korean victims, both living and dead, to focus on a figure buried in paragraph 664 of the commission’s report: $645,800,000....That is what the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, is said to have squandered in 2012 on “luxury goods,” including cosmetics, handbags, leather products, watches, electronics, cars and top-shelf alcohol.

Even allowing for mistranslation/misinterpretation/misappenment (or, even a very-large family), what are the realistic chances of him spending exactly twice as much on ballistic missiles as handbags?

In that same year, Mr. Kim also spent $1.3 billion on his ballistic missile programs.

Based on the balance of probabilities, do you believe this reporting? Oh, wait a minute....they meant $1.3 trillion, on missiles. Except I just made that up. Like they did.

History is written by the victors, and it is re-edited every day.
 
I don't have a political slant on it as such. I regard any papers 'facts' with suspicion. It's just that if he is starving his people in great numbers to build missiles, I find it hard to think that other countries should continue to give funds and resources. China's human rights record appears to be grim, so they were never going to reel North Korea in. As ever, 'little' people suffer while world leaders act like dick heads.
 
Used to listen in regularly bring back the Lincolnshire Poacher all is forgiven.
 
Back
Top