I don’t ever recall any A7 Corsair aircraft ever operating in UK airspace whereas the A10 Warthog was quite a regular visitor. ...
If (and it may well be a big if) the Harrier was subsequently added to the image, then maybe I was shown an original unedited photograph when down the pit at Pitreavie Castle…….as I said earlier, I don’t even recall seeing an aircraft alongside the diamond shaped object.
Just had time to watch the full show. Fascinating. The two young men were not chefs but English seasonal kitchen porters. Clarke has been able to track down at least three members of staff who would have known them but they each state they don't remember anything. Quite a lot of other detail too and I believe the RAF chap checks out 100%.Here's an hour long video on how the above photo known as 'The Calvine Photo' came to be 'found' again after all these years:
Just to bump the photo analysis as it answers a few question....Another interesting aspect to this image is that it was taken on black and white film, but printed on colour film; the colours in the photo are a chromatic aberration. In other words - the colours in this image are not real.
Here's a detailed analysis by Andrew Robinson, of Sheffield Hallam University. Hallam have a large archive of UFO material, largely amassed by David Clarke.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tWMZ232qgDE6Tru7jwgG-nsqoeQZpIm3/view
View attachment 57973
Possibly……. I do wish I’d given the photo more scrutiny than I did……I had the feeling that the Flight Lieutenant showing it to me was interested in my reaction……I must have come across as quite indifferent to the whole thing.According to the (Clarke / Lindsay et al.) video the other aircraft (described only as a "jet") appears in different positions among the 6 original photos. It may be that the one you saw happened to be a shot in which the circling "jet" was out of frame or obscured behind / beyond the object. In the video there's a passing mention that there was one shot in which the "jet" was almost wholly obscured by the object.
Great find and an interesting theory. Explains the blurred background, too. Also found reference on David Clarke's twitter to a Puerto Rican hoax with an object and plane that are quite similar to the Calvine photo (click on image):Huge amount of discussion on the UFO subreddit of course. IMO this guy has nailed it.
Bur others are welcome to disagree.
I think part of the counter-argument to the reflection theory is that the bottom half of the UFO does not mirror the top half. But that assumes the UFO was originally a thing sticking out of water, and that assumption could be a mistake.
I think it’s more likely toe a flat square piece of plastic or card floating on top of a pool, which has been coloured diagonally (like the anarchist flag).
That means a hoax, then.
A crying shame because I so wanted this to be real
That’s the same thing lol, because it’s a reflection.However, it is already being pointed out that the analysis found an upward angle, not downward to a lake...
This argument deserves greater analysis. I would dearly like to know if there was money involved when the negatives were handed to the Daily Record. David Clarke seems to think one witness name was written on the back of the newly-found original print, but then doesn't mention this in the conclusion so maybe enquiries are on-goingThat’s the same thing lol, because it’s a reflection.
Instead of photographing the whole scene, our photographer only photographs the reflection. He prints it out onto paper. And then he rotates the print 180 degrees, so that what was bottom is now top. It now seems that you are looking up, but that’s because the photo has been flipped.
Because the photo is (probably) a reflection, when it is flipped it looks like the camera is at ground level, looking up. The hoaxer had to come up with a reason for why the camera appeared to be held so close to the ground (“we were scared so we hid in a bush”).
But in reality he took the photo at normal head height, looking down towards the pond. IMO.
It would be interesting to know if the Daily Record ran an earlier, big UFO story that July or early-AugustI don't think it particularly matters how the hoax was carried out - if it was a hoax. The 'reflection' idea is interesting, but proves nothing, and is probably unverifiable without a confession. The interest here was always in the MoJ response, which clearly shows they considered it possible the US could fly stuff around their airspace without letting them know.
Sorry, but anyone that mixes up the Royal Air Force with the British Army really hasn’t done their research and loses much of their credibility as far as I’m concerned!Interesting short video on youtube regarding this incident:
The Calvine Incident: What is the Government Hiding in Scotland
Sorry but I don't know who those two groups are, and I was looking at the UFO info!Sorry, but anyone that mixes up the Royal Air Force with the British Army really hasn’t done their research and loses much of their credibility as far as I’m concerned!
It would be interesting to know if the Daily Record ran an earlier, big UFO story that July or early-August
The reason I stick to this forum is plain to see on those you have mentioned, with mud-slinging and name-calling obscuring any nuggets of information.'UAP Twitter' / Metabunk / reddit / etc seem to have lost their collective minds, predictably enough. I mean, although we've got a better quality copy of the picture, we're essentially in pretty much the same position we were a few years ago with this one!
*Army; *Marine Corps, *Navy, *Air Force, *Space Force, and *Coast Guard. ("Just for the record.")Well, I guess now I know! LOL
We have Marines, the Navy and Air Force people also.
And thank you for your service!
The reason I stick to this forum is plain to see on those you have mentioned, with mud-slinging and name-calling obscuring any nuggets of information.
I can see a scenario where a young English student took photos of a still pond/lake with the interesting object that looks a bit like a mythical island. By happenstance a Harrier or two fly over and he catches their reflection in the pond/lake and it makes a 'cool' photo, especially as he was using black and white film. He then takes photos to his minimum wage kitchen porter summer job up in Scotland. Shows them to a someone local who agrees it looks like a UFO and suggests the Daily Record would pay good money for them and a hoax is born.
The ensuing 'panic' at the Mod was that the reflected object looks like a possible stealth project and the chance inclusion of the Harrier/s only serves to underline this. When pressed, the MoD were truthful in their denial that Harriers were operating in Scotland and actually that is where our young photography slipped up.
That our English photographer chose a job in the Scottish highlands and went off hill walking some distance from the hotel suggests to me he was familiar with such a landscape, so maybe he lived in somewhere in England like the Lake District or Peak District where the RAF are allowed to practice low-level flying...? It would also explain why he never kicked up a fuss that his photographs - considered the best in British UFO history - went missing or that he didn't ever pop up and say 'Oh by the way, here are some copies I made before I contacted the Daily Record'.
Anyway, its a theory....
The 1989 Chris Gibson oil rig black triangle sighting deserves a mention:
Chris Gibson, an oil drill engineer, told Jane's he saw the aircraft from the rig Galveston Key in August 1989. A trained member of the Royal Observer Corps, he said that it was apparently refuelling from a KC-135 tanker and was escorted by two F- 111 bombers. Although high, it was clearly visible against high cloud.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/oil-rig-engineer-sketches-secret-us-spy-aircraft-1563429.html
And...
"In August 1989, Chris Gibson, a Scottish oil-exploration engineer and, at the time, a member of the British Royal Observer Corps (ROC), was working on the oil rig Galveston Key in the North Sea when he noticed an aircraft in the shape of a pure isoceles triangle refuelling from a KC-135 Stratotanker alongside two F-111s."
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/the-north-sea-aurora-sighting.2868/
His highly-reputable sighting took place off the north coast of England. He has drawn the object for documentaries and is clearly skilled at drawing aircraft for identification purposes. Does it look like the Calvine object? No, not much, but I do feel it is proof the US were flying prototype aircraft in the North Sea off England.
personal opinion is that the aircraft that Gibson spotted was the Lockheed "Quartz" project. This supposedly was a fairly large subsonic testbed aircraft, which was built to test out some very sophisticated (and expensive) stealth technology. Like the Have Blues and most other "black" projects, it was never designed or built to be an operational aircraft. It was put together quickly from mostly existing components, and the airframe was designed specifically to test out whatever the fancy technology was. It was not a hypersonic or even supersonic plane, although it may have been a very sleek looking delta shape. Its flights were probably long, boring test runs across the open ocean, and F-111's would have been sensible chase planes.
My own speculation is that the Quartz project ran for maybe a decade total, made a bunch of test flights with one or two airframes, and the technology was generally proven successful. Lockheed's hope was to transition it into a contract to design and build a small fleet of very stealthy recon planes to replace the TR-1's and SR-71's. The idea was super stealth rather than super speed. But it never happened. Either the technology was too expensive, or the customer couldn't figure out an operational requirement to get the program together, or whatever. So, as with most black projects, parts of the technology were used on other projects, and any remaining airframes were mothballed or cut up.
I believe that the "Aurora" project never existed, in the form that Bill Sweetman and the common stories have it. The myth is put together from scraps of info about different projects, plus some very wishful thinking. I'm sure there were (or are) a few black projects working on experimental powerplant development for high speed planes. But they're mostly aimed at future hypersonic drones and cruise missiles. Whatever has been occasionally cracking the sky and leaving funny trails is most likely a testbed aircraft, built purely for engine testing
Great find.That forum has some fascinating theories about what people might have been seeing, eg: