Ogdred Weary
Drag(on) Queen
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,134
It is one of those pesky 99.9:0.1 cases. 99.9% it's a hoax; 0.1% it's an unknown species of 2 – 3 foot long (60 cm – 90 cm) monster. In this size range, it is not completely inconsistent with being an unknown species of freshwater nudibranch.
I do not have the facilities or experience to do proper scientific analysis, but I've spent a lot of my time around water, having been a scuba diver, kayaker, and sailor. Everything about those waves around the "monster" tells me intuitively they are small ripples, and the "monster" is no bigger than a goose. Cormorants are smaller than geese, but often swim with their bodies almost completely submerged prior to diving. However, those who have looked into the photo, and the less well known second photo have concluded it was a hoax.
Cormorants swimming with their bodies submerged, heads extended. Imagine a badly focussed badly exposed version of these pictures in which the bill (beak) is unclear.
View attachment 63529 View attachment 63530
I didn't know "sea slugs" got as big as that - though I suppose an unusually large species could be. I didn't realise that there were freshwater species either.
I have often wondered if the Surgeon's Photo was an opportunistic rather than than pre-meditated hoax. What I mean is maybe a branch with a smaller branch (not sure of an alternative term) was floating and looked "creature like" and the man with the camera decided to have a little joke with it. Turned out to be more than a little joke though...