How huge a temperature inversion? How did they measure the inversion, and where is the hard data?
They present a failure of equipment as important evidence. Use different equipment, operated by different experts.
They present a failure of equipment as important evidence. Use different equipment, operated by different experts. In particular, keep Travis away from the investigation- things 'go wrong' when he is around.
Hard data please. We saw Travis attempting to measure the magnetic field near a metal fence; but there are other ways to produce faulty data if you are particularly unfortunate with the equipment. Use different equipment, operated by different experts. In particular, keep Travis away from the investigation- things 'go wrong' when he is around.
This 'dangerous microwave radiation' was detected using a trifield meter - which can only detect radiation to the top of the safe range. Mick West replicated these readings using his own trifield meter and suffered no ill effects. Use different equipment, operated by different experts.
Subjective, psychological effects. No doubt real, from the point of view of the sufferers.
Steven Greenstreet asked to see the UAP footage, and it was all unconvincing. Perhaps they have better footage elsewhere, but they need to have it examined in detail by independent experts. Give it to NASA, or Mick West, or even to us here at FT. Use different equipment, operated by different experts. In particular, keep Travis away from the investigation - he does appear to be genuine, but he seems entirely blind to any mundane explanations.
Replication and hard, analysable data is the mark of good science; I'm not seeing either of that here.