• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Weird Sex (Practices, Preferences & Accoutrements!)

darth-vader-fetish.jpg
 
Now, come on, lads.

We shouldn't be judgmental of Yith's little hobby. :lol:
 
I make a handsome living out of that! Hobby indeed....

As or my contorted poses, well they only had the outfit in a size smaller than i needed. It's murder getting the old chap tucked away snugly into that...
 
I've always found the following more disturbing (and not just the level of artistic ability on display):

/!\ WARNING: None of this is work safe and is not really "safe" at all - contains sexual images of unusual and unpleasant sexual activity:

Xenophile - its tentacle porn but with aliens (which may actually make it worse - if thats possible):
www.thexenophile.com

Vore - this was Chupacbras' Dar Domain but has gone onto be something a bit slicker but it still sticks to its remit which while now "women in peril" is still really women being eaten (by other people and various animals) and doing all manner of vile things:
www.afterdarkfantasies.com

I suppose while the images are profoundly disturbing the thing that really creeps me out is that some people get their jollies from this kind of thing. Now I'm quite happy for people to do their own thing but if thats really someone's cup of tea are they really right in the head?
 
I've always found the following more disturbing
Click to expand...
Yup, took you a while to make your mind up though, did it? :lol:
 
In your defence, the milk-bottle-base-thickness spectacles don't help much. ;)

Oh look, here's Emps on a typical Saturday night.

794400.1.jpg
 
[edit: And how in God's name did I miss that!! Thats just....]

--------------------
lopaka3 said:
:shock:

Seattle man dies after sex with horse

Police say death was accidental, investigate farm on cruelty suspicions

Updated: 9:12 p.m. ET July 15, 2005

SEATTLE - A Seattle man died after engaging in anal sex with a horse at a farm suspected of being a gathering place for people seeking to have sex with livestock, police said Friday.

The horse involved in the incident was not harmed, and an autopsy of the unnamed man concluded that “the manner of death was accidental ... due to perforation of the colon,” a police spokesman said.

“The information that we have is that people would find this place via chat rooms on the Web,” said Sgt. John Urquhart of the King County Sheriff’s Department.

Although sex with animals is not illegal in Washington state, Urquhart said that investigators were looking into whether the farm, located in Enumclaw, 40 miles southeast of Seattle, allowed sex with smaller animals that resulted in animal cruelty, which is a crime.

“If you’re talking about sheep or goats, there could be some issues,” Urquhart said.

Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited.
Click to expand...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8589349/
Click to expand...

http://www.forteantimes.com/forum/viewt ... 056#560056

Update:

Trespassing charged in horse-sex case

By Jennifer Sullivan
Seattle Times staff reporter

An Enumclaw-area man who authorities say helped run a farm where people had sex with animals was charged with a misdemeanor yesterday in connection with a Seattle man's death.

Police began investigating James Tait, 54, and another man who lived at the rural Southeast King County farm after the Seattle man died of injuries suffered during intercourse with a horse at a neighboring farm, Enumclaw police said.

The criminal-trespassing charge stems from a July 2 bestiality session involving Tait, the 45-year-old Seattle man and a horse in a neighbor's barn, charging papers say. According to the King County Medical Examiner's Office, the Seattle man died of acute peritonitis due to perforation of the colon.

Attempts to contact Tait yesterday were unsuccessful.

King County prosecutors say it's the most-severe charge they could file; Washington is one of more than a dozen states that does not outlaw bestiality.

"There is no evidence of injury to the animal to support animal-cruelty charges," said Dan Satterberg, the county prosecutor's chief of staff. "This is the only crime we can charge."

When interviewed by The Seattle Times July 15, the horse's owners said they had known their neighbors for years. The couple, who asked to have their names withheld to protect their privacy, said they were shocked when police showed them a home video of the July 2 incident that investigators seized from their neighbor's home. The couple identified their barn and their horse.

According to the King County Sheriff's Office, which also investigated, the farm was known in Internet chat rooms as a destination for people who want to have sex with livestock. Authorities didn't learn about the farm until July 2, when a man drove to Enumclaw Community Hospital seeking medical assistance for a companion. Medics wheeled the Seattle man into an examination room and realized he was dead. When hospital workers looked for the man who had dropped him off, he was gone, Enumclaw police said.

Using the dead man's driver's license to track down relatives and acquaintances, investigators were led to the Enumclaw farm.

Because the other man who lived at the farm wasn't there the night the Seattle man died, he wasn't charged with trespassing, Satterberg said. Tait will be arraigned Oct. 27; he faces up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine if convicted.

The Seattle man isn't being identified because his family asked that his name not be released.

The man's brother said he understands that prosecutors can't file a felony charge but remains disappointed that Tait wouldn't face more than a year behind bars.

In the wake of the man's death, State Sen. Pam Roach, R-Auburn, has said she plans to draft legislation making bestiality illegal in Washington.

----------------
Jennifer Sullivan: 206-464-8294 or [email protected]

Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company
Click to expand...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/l ... ex19m.html
 
Miss Garland, 39, from Manchester appeared on stage as poet "Rosie Lugosi, the Vampire Queen," a comedy act.
Click to expand...

Rosie's also one of the organisers of Club Lash in Manchester, and a former member of the March Violets...


Xenophile - its tentacle porn but with aliens (which may actually make it worse - if thats possible):
Click to expand...

I didn't find that too bad. The artwork is (poss. thankfully) a little scrappy. Now if it had been photographs, that would have creeped me out.
 
looner
Someone erotically attracted to balloons. The big question, to pop or not to pop. Flame wars over the issue take up a significant amount of space on the balloon fetish chatrooms. While non-poppers feel an emotional attachment to balloons and can get quite protective of their inflatable friends; poppers see no point to jerking off with balloons unless they explode.
Click to expand...

http://mindprod.com/ggloss/looner.html
 
:shock:

Updated Dec. 13, 2005, 4:58 p.m. ET

Receptionist sues boss for allegedly masturbating on her


By Lisa Sweetingham
Court TV


Jorge Garcia is a polite, soft-spoken man who answers his own phone at his legal services firm in Houston. In fact, he has become his own secretary since his receptionist quit, filed criminal charges against him, and sued Garcia for allegedly masturbating on her during her second day on the job.

Kristina Roberts, 37, claims she was alone at JEG Advertising with her new boss on Sept. 9 when he approached her while holding his penis.

"Plaintiff was sitting at her desk doing the work she was given earlier that day when Mr. Garcia came up behind her," her civil suit says. "He asked Ms. Roberts to turn around, and when she did, defendant proceeded to ejaculate onto her and her clothing. Mr. Garcia apologized and stated that he did not mean to do that."

"You don't really want to go there, do you? I really don't have any comment at all," Garcia told Courttv.com when asked about the incident. "Just say it was consensual."

There is no mention of consensual activity in Roberts' suit, filed after Thanksgiving in Harris County.

A police spokesman confirmed that Roberts called police on Sept. 29, accusing Garcia of masturbating in her presence. Garcia was charged with one count of misdemeanor indecent exposure on Oct. 28, and he voluntarily turned himself in to authorities.

"She's just lying about everything," Garcia said. "Everything that happened was between the both of us. It was consensual. It had nothing to do with what she's saying. But I don't really want to say anything else."

Roberts and Garcia both say they have no history together. They met through a mutual acquaintance. He needed help around the office. She needed a job.

Roberts, who declined to be interviewed, has been in therapy since allegedly being ejaculated on, according to her attorney Ken Bigham.

"Her reaction was obviously one of disbelief at first," Bigham told Courttv.com. "And then shock, and outrage. It scared her badly."

Roberts has yet to seek a new job. She claims in her suit to continue to suffer from mental anguish and humiliation from Garcia's "extreme and outrageous conduct."

She is seeking unspecified damages for assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence for Garcia's "failing to control his actions."

Her attorney concedes that the offense may sound almost inconceivable to outsiders.

"In my business, when you're relying on eyewitness testimony, the person has to be credible. And by all appearances, I believe she is very credible," Bigham said. "If I didn't believe that she was telling the truth, I wouldn't try to help her."

Bigham says he hopes to locate previous JEG employees, because while he is unaware of any similar incidents, he has suspicions.

"A guy doesn't wake up one day and decide to do this to somebody," he said. "This is the most egregious thing I've ever seen in the workplace."

Garcia says he intends to plead not guilty to the indecent exposure charge when he returns to court on Dec. 20.

If convicted in the criminal case, he faces a maximum sentence of six months in prison and $2,000 in fines.
Click to expand...

www.courttv.com/news/2005/1213/garcia_ctv.html
 
Mighty_Emperor said:
One wonders what a certain FTMBer has been up to now:

Wyoming Men Cited for Making Snow Phallus


Apr 30, 4:41 PM (ET)

LARAMIE, Wyo. (AP) - Two men have pleaded not guilty to promoting obscenity for allegedly building a snow phallus in their front yard.

Brandon Arp, 20, and Aric Davenport, 19, were arraigned Friday in circuit court.

Police say Arp and Davenport built the sculpture April 21. Neighbors found the sculpture offensive and, although someone destroyed it, the two were cited.

Davenport's attorney, Michael Vang, said it's not clear how the sculpture was obscene. He accused police of selective enforcement.

---

Information from: Laramie Daily Boomerang, http://www.laramieboomerang.com
Click to expand...

Source (good newspaper name for this!!)

See previous incidents:
www.forteantimes.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 553#499553
Click to expand...

And more:

December 14, 2005

Was it art or was it snow porn?

By John Doherty
Times Herald-Record
[email protected]


New Windsor - What, some might ask Jessica Sherer, is with the giant snow penis she built on her boyfriend's lawn this week?

As everyone knows, phallic displays were central to Viking winter solstice celebrations of fertility and rebirth. Yeah. So what.

And readers of this paper surely know that phallic rituals were as much a part of the Hopi Indian winter festivals as the Hawk dance.

But down on Quassaick Avenue, around the corner from the New Windsor Elementary School, the 6-foot tall, anatomically correct, finely detailed penis raised some questions Monday.

Especially for police.

"We got some calls that people thought it was offensive," said New Windsor police Chief Michael Biasotti. "We assumed it was some kids who did it."

Officers found no one home. Assuming the snow sculpture was more prank than nod to Christmas' pagan roots, the police knocked it down. Beat it down with shovels, actually.

"We came back around 11 in the morning, and it was just a pile of snow," recalled Sherer, 19. "Just some shovel marks."

Sherer, um, erected the statue with her boyfriend and another friend Sunday. She said she was surprised to hear some neighbors took offense.

Motorists honked their approval, and people walking by pointed and laughed, she said.

"People were waving and laughing," she said. "It was pretty funny."

No citations or criminal violations will be issued for the display, Biasotti said. The town codes prohibit lewd signs on businesses, but don't mention anything about public snow sculptures.

"We probably weren't 100 percent correct in going on the property and knocking it down," New Windsor Town Supervisor George Meyers said. "But our intentions were pure. Some people were offended. There are school buses going by there all day."

The last two nights of freezing weather has made the snow too stiff to sculpt, said Sherer. But she intends to rebuild.

"In a couple of days, Thursday or Friday, after it gets a little warmer," she promises.

Police and town officials aren't sure what their move will be.

"I'd want the police to talk to the property owner if we got complaints, ask them to take it down" Meyers said. "But after that, I don't think there's too much we can do."

Biasotti worries the display might give others ideas. "Now we're going to get snow penises popping up all over town," he said.

Many scholars, of course, trace the origin of the modern-day yule log to ancient pagan totems to virility and sun-god worship. Is that what Sherer was going for?

"We just did it because we were really bored, and we thought it'd be funny," she said. "It was huge."
Click to expand...

With before and after piccies:
www.recordonline.com/archive/2005/12/14 ... 12-14.html
 
the 6-foot tall, anatomically correct, finely detailed penis raised some questions Monday.
Click to expand...
if that's anatomically correct AND finely detailed then american penises must be all drawn on!
 
Man pleads no contest to sex with cattle

Associated Press
Dec. 23, 2005 04:01 PM

NEILLSVILLE, Wis. - A 64-year-old man has pleaded no contest to charges in Clark County Circuit Court after telling police he regularly had been using calves for sexual gratification.

Harold G. Hart was placed on two years probation Thursday and ordered to have psychological counseling and an alcohol and drug abuse assessment after pleading to charges of sexual gratification with an animal and disorderly conduct.

According to the criminal complaint, the family living on the farm Hart visited, installed a motion sensor because they had seen suspicious footprints and vehicle tracks.

When the sensor sounded, Hart was caught leaving the barn. He later told police the farm was a routine stop, usually after bar closing or on trips to strip clubs near Marshfield or Neillsville.

Hart told police he had gone to the farm at least 50 times in the last year, sometimes two to four times in a week.
Click to expand...

www.azcentral.com/offbeat//articles/122 ... ex-CR.html
 
It really does make you wonder about the human race:

Suspect Allegedly Had Sex With Mother's Body After Killing Her

POSTED: 6:57 am EST December 22, 2005

BRADENTON, Fla. -- Prosecutors charged a 19-year-old man Wednesday with the murders of his mother and grandfather.


Clifford Anthony Davis, 19, was also charged with one count of abuse of a dead human body, two counts of robbery and one count of grand theft of a firearm, the Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported.

Davis told investigators he killed his 42-year-old mother, Stephanie Davis, then had sex with the body, Bradenton police said.

Hours later, after leaving his mother's half-nude body and going shopping, he came back to the apartment and killed his 77-year-old grandfather, Joel C. Hill, police said.

Later his grandfather, who lived near the mall, drove him back to the apartment Davis shared with his mother. Davis, who is 6-foot-4 and weighs 250 pounds, told police he tried to kill his grandfather with a knife.

When Hill put up a struggle, Davis stood on the man's neck until he died, police said.

Davis' grandmother, Nancy Hill, discovered the bodies.

Davis was being held without bail at the Manatee County jail.

A telephone message left after hours at the Sarasota public defender's office was not immediately returned.

---------------
Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press.
Click to expand...

www.wftv.com/news/5608937/detail.html
 
'Nudity invalidates marriage'

January 9, 2006 - 10:30AM

An Egyptian cleric's controversial fatwa claiming that nudity during sexual intercourse invalidates a marriage has uncovered a rift among Islamic scholars.

According to the religious edict issued by Rashad Hassan Khalil, a former dean of Al-Azhar University's faculty of Sharia (or Islamic law), "being completely naked during the act of coitus annuls the marriage".

The religious decree sparked a hot debate on the private satellite network Dream's popular religious talk show and on the front page of today's Al-Masri Al-Yom, Egypt's leading independent daily newspaper.

Suad Saleh, who heads the women's department of Al-Azhar's Islamic studies faculty, pleaded for "anything that can bring spouses closer to each other" and rejected the claim that nudity during intercourse could invalidate a union.

During the live televised debate, Islamic scholar Abdel Muti dismissed the fatwa: "Nothing is prohibited during marital sex, except of course sodomy."
Click to expand...

www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/01/09/1136 ... ?from=top5
 
Research proposals

Who would have sex with a stranger?

Marc Abrahams
Tuesday January 10, 2006
The Guardian

Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers should be a screamingly famous research report. Yet most people don't know about it. Or maybe they can't believe it exists. It exists.

Published in 1989 in the Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, this nine-page sizzler tells a simple tale. Five women and four men were sent, one at a time, on to a college campus. Each approached strangers of the opposite sex, and said: "I have been noticing you around campus. I find you to be very attractive." They then invited the strangers to have sex.

This experiment was performed twice, once in 1978, and again in 1982. The results were the same. As the report describes it: "The great majority of men were willing to have a sexual liaison with the women who approached them. Not one woman agreed to a sexual liaison."

The study was conceived and directed by two psychology professors, Elaine Hatfield, of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and Russell D Clark III, of Florida State University.

It begins with a declaration: "According to cultural stereotypes, men are eager for sexual intercourse; it is women who set limits on such activity." It ends with a declamation: "Regardless of why we secured these data, however, the existence of these pronounced gender differences is interesting."

The paper never does exactly explain why they secured the data, but it does supply a list of 59 earlier published studies that they found useful, interesting, or at least worth listing.

These include four other sex-related reports by Hatfield and three technical reports from the prestigious US Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Fourteen years later, Hatfield and Clark published a study called Love in the Afternoon, in which they tried to explain why they had done the experiment and what happened as a result. Here is a nutshell version of their explanation:

In the spring of 1978, Russ Clark was teaching a small class in experimental social psychology. Russ dropped a bomb. "Most women," he said, "can get any man to do anything they want. Men have it harder. They have to worry about strategy, timing and tricks."

Not surprisingly, the women in the class were incensed. One woman sent a pencil flying in Russ's direction.

In one of Russ's finer moments, he observed: "We don't have to fight. We don't have to upset one another. It's an empirical question. Let's design a field experiment to see who's right!"

Journal after journal refused to publish their paper, giving harsh comments, of which this one is typical: "The study itself is too weird, trivial and frivolous to be interesting. Who cares what the result is to such a silly question."

But Hatfield and Clark were undaunted. As they explain at the end of the paper Love in the Afternoon: "The trivial, uninteresting and morally suspect research of today often turns out to be the classic study of tomorrow."
Click to expand...

http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekl ... 01,00.html
 
I saw this elsewhere today:

http://kodesex.com/

coded sexual compatibility icons like a sentence without words.

kodesex may look innocently like funky art on your gear, but these pix speak volumes about the wearer. Those in the know will zero in on their heart's desire, while the rest will walk by clueless. It's smarter than the old hanky codes and more grown up than jelly or sex bracelets. And it's the next best thing to mind-reading.

Know the kode.
Click to expand...
 
So... the inevitable question is: how did the female research participants (they who made the 'indecent' proposals) disentangle themselves from the situation?

A bit awkwardly, I'd imagine. Poor disappointed fools. :lol:
 
You know.... I read about the above study and then navigated away from the page. And then something came across me which I couldn't push aside and now I have to post it. With the whole study of whether or not a man or woman would have consentual sex with a stranger:

The ONLY reason that the women wouldn't do it, is for fear that it might become public knowledge. Both men and women I beleive have practically the same sex drive on average, its all a matter of how distressing it would be for someone to know that you had sex with a stranger, not simply a matter of whether or not they would. See, the men already know that they are considered sex hounds so therfor it doesn't matter to them who knows about it (it could even BOOST their reputation in college life). I see no connection with this study and male vs female sex drives. Anybody reading me on this one? :?
 
I see what you're saying. Perhaps if the men and women knew nobody would find out it'd be more fair - the only way I can think of that working though would be for the surveyors to ask people who were on holiday alone - and so wouldn't need to worry about people they know finding out. But that's an awfully specific type of person to find ;)
 
I think the women are likely to decline because going off with a stranger who just asked for sex could lead to rape.

--------------
Electric_Monk said:
I saw this elsewhere today:

http://kodesex.com/

coded sexual compatibility icons like a sentence without words.

kodesex may look innocently like funky art on your gear, but these pix speak volumes about the wearer. Those in the know will zero in on their heart's desire, while the rest will walk by clueless. It's smarter than the old hanky codes and more grown up than jelly or sex bracelets. And it's the next best thing to mind-reading.

Know the kode.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Blimey - the anal sex one looks frightening and would you shake hands with someone wearing a shirt that said they liked to be crapped on?

And what if you bought say a "I'm looking for golden showers" T shirt for an unsuspecting friend? :shock:
 
Blimey - the anal sex one looks frightening and would you shake hands with someone wearing a shirt that said they liked to be crapped on?
Click to expand...

The sadomasochism one is quit sweet:

kodesex_element_sm.jpg


but the fisting one is pretty scary:

kodesex_element_fisting.jpg
 
Mighty_Emperor said:
I think the women are likely to decline because going off with a stranger who just asked for sex could lead to rape.
Click to expand...

Personally that isn't why i'd refuse - I mean if I wanted to sleep with him, there'd be no need for him to rape me, although it could still happen I guess. I just wouldn't want to sleep with some random stranger. It wouldn't be that I wouldn't want people to think I'm a slag, it wouldn't be fear of rape or diseases or anything, I just wouldn't want to sleep with a total stranger, even a fit one.
 
fluffle9 said:
Mighty_Emperor said:
I think the women are likely to decline because going off with a stranger who just asked for sex could lead to rape.
Click to expand...

Personally that isn't why i'd refuse - I mean if I wanted to sleep with him, there'd be no need for him to rape me, although it could still happen I guess. I just wouldn't want to sleep with some random stranger. It wouldn't be that I wouldn't want people to think I'm a slag, it wouldn't be fear of rape or diseases or anything, I just wouldn't want to sleep with a total stranger, even a fit one.
Click to expand...

You are one of the select few. And although I'm male, I happen to be the same way as you. Almost all other kinds of people would do it IMO, under different circumstances however.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top