Britain's big cats strike back
Britain's big cats strike back
Sightings of pumas and leopards in the British countryside are soaring, as are the number of unexplained attacks. So why does no one take them seriously?
Mark Townsend
Sunday February 9, 2003
The Observer
By the time Mike Cole realised the creature skulking in his garden was not a fox it was too late. The intruder growled and lashed out, slashing open Cole's hand.
He staggered back, bleeding, and watched in astonishment as a lynx the size of a labrador bounded from his Kent lawn.
Feline experts were unanimous that only a big cat could deliver the two gouges that still disfigure the optician's right hand. Police interest was further aroused by a flurry of big cat sightings in the surrounding woodlands near Gravesham.
That was in January last year. Two days later, another attack was reported. Doris Moore, 52, in Aberdeenshire, had disturbed a beast in a stable. It lashed out, leaving her with three puncture wounds.
Since those incidents, recorded sightings of pumas, panthers and other wild beasts have soared to 1,200 compared with 438 in 2001. Every county has now reported sightings, from lynxes and leopards to pumas and ocelots.
Sightings are now running at three a day. In the past week there have been 'suspicious sheep kills' in Wales and Herefordshire, three cattle mauled in Shropshire and big cat sightings in Norfolk and Nottinghamshire.
Professor Alayne Street-Perrot, who is investigating the phenomenon at the University of Swansea, said: 'Either massive numbers of country people are experiencing social psychosis or there is something out there that is worth investigating.'
Last summer, the British Big Cats Society, a national network of 600 members including 30 police officers and academics, revealed it had assembled a dossier supporting the presence of feline predators in the countryside.
Eyewitness accounts, paw prints, livestock kills and hair samples were included. Photographs showed the bodies of 12 cats, including black leopards, puma and lynx found in the UK.
Government officials were, however, apparently unimpressed. A growing body of police officers and experts suspect a big cat cover-up has been ordered by Whitehall.
Terry Hooper, co-ordinator of the Exotic Animal Register, which has compiled hundreds of big cat sightings since the Seventies, said: 'Politically it's become a very hot potato.'
After Cole's attack, Hooper contacted the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, offering to share his data but claims the department did not respond.
For many, the final straw came last month when a dog's throat was ripped and part of its stomach torn out in an attack in Carmarthenshire, Wales. A farmer saw a black 'puma-like' beast soaked in blood standing over the body. Police arriving at the scene claim to have seen a big cat disappearing into the dark.
Fur found in the dog's mouth was taken to the governmental central science laboratories in York for DNA testing. The results - released to the media before the police were informed - found the fur came from a dog or possibly a badger.
'Yet how was it killed in such a horrific manner?' asked Hooper. Danny Bampling, founder of the Big Cats Society, argues another big cat attack has not been disproved.
Government veterinary experts admitted the dog's injuries were consistent with attack by a large predator. However, Defra still claims there is no proof to order a full investigation. 'We take the issue seriously and investigate reports. But so far we have nothing to support a big cat breeding population in this country,' said a spokesman.
The Government could be wishing to avoid harming the fragile rural economy. Ministers are still smarting from criticism over their closure of tracts of countryside during the foot-and-mouth epidemic. More adverse publicity is the last thing it requires as it seeks to lure back tourism.
There is also suspicion that admitting there could be big cats in the wild could trigger a compensation claim from farmers who have lost livestock to wild felines.
It has been eight years since the Government investigated the issue: then, following a six-month inquiry, the 'Beast of Bodmin' was declared a myth.
The Big Cats Society will this spring approach Defra and the Home Office with every scrap of evidence it has collected over the past 18 months. If that fails to convince Ministers to start examining the issue, says Bampling, it could serve as final proof of a conspiracy.
Sightings of big cats have been recorded in Britain as far back as 1860, but it is thought the problem spiralled with laws introduced in 1976 that encouraged owners of dangerous pets to release animals into the wild rather than have them put down.
Now, though, the overriding concern is that it will take a human fatality before the authorities act. 'My biggest fear is that a small child will come across a big cat and try to stroke it,' said Cole.
[email protected]