i asked spooky london on facebook and they said the ghost club have no plans to record the talk.
I have the same problem. I recall an article probably within the last 4 years if that helps?Can someone tell me which issue of Fortrean Times had a fairly comprehensive article on the Enfield case, please? I scanned the hundreds of copies I have, but the topics on the spines all become a blur after a few issues.
I seem to recall the general tone of the article was that fakery was afoot.
Local film-fan checks out the real location.
I have removed every post since January 26th to a place of safety. So, if you were eagerly expecting the next episode of the tedious, round-the-houses-but-getting-nowhere saga of attention seeking and bickering, then I'm afraid you're out of luck. I've weighed up the pros and cons and whatabouts and so on, and this is, as far as I'm concerned, the best solution all round.
Now, back to where we were before the sideshow.
You could try contacting musichunch via pm and asking them how they did it. That way it need involve no-one else at all. It's not as if musichunch is banned or anything, and in fact was online this morning.
On which post, to post?That would depend entirely upon whether you would actually share any info, or just come back with "I believe him but can't tell you", in which case don't bother.
Thanks, Stu.Yes. That'll do. Just leave this one alone.
I bring it back into public view as a separate, locked thread.
Stuart Certain still owes me £5 ... or it might be the other way round.
Typical! He bet me a fiver I couldn't hit that photographer with a bit of lego from across the room. It was a lot of money in them days.
But to be serious and return to the point of this thread, I suppose everything that can be said about the case has been said - and every speculation speculated upon. Nevertheless, what I find remarkable about Janet's 'voices' is the things they said. I can see how she could maintain the guttural timbre whilst managing not to betray the concentration required in her face...what's impressive is that there genuinely seemed to be an adult mind at work, albeit a puerile, nasty and deceitful one.
Nothing low about it whatsoever. I'm open to the possibility that she was influenced by something beyond a child's imagination, mischievousness and/or attention-seeking. Like anyone interested in the case I'm unqualified to hypothesise beyond gut feelings based on my experience of human behavour and my own imagination. Though it would be prudent not to let imagination lead the way.
I'm sure unpleasant things have been said about Janet and maybe the rest of her family. An unfortunate side effect of the internet age is that upleasant things have been said about almost every human being alive, and about many not so alive. Do you have an opinion regarding the genesis of the voices?