You couldn't make it up.
Sadly, when it comes to most journalism in the MSM these days, 'making it up' is the last phrase that should be used!
You couldn't make it up.
Once again, this thread seems to be taking a turn for the worse. Dragging in completely unrelated cases (save for the legal team) isn't helping. It's a delicate subject, not least because it's not only still sub-judice, the McCanns haven't even been charged with anything at the time of writing. It's certainly a legit subject for discussion, but one which has to be treated with, at least for the time being, a bit of thought and consideration.
OK?
Yes, but we're not mindless idiots who can't have a discussion without foaming at the mouth, are we? You're right, of course, the sort of stuff that gets posted (and often as not, rapidly pulled) even on the BBC site is appallingly nasty. It doesn't mean we have to sink to that level too, does it?Quake42 said:In fairness, the comments on this board are pretty tame compared to user-left comments on some of the national newspaper websites...
are just pointlessly spiteful, and probably libellous to all the people named.There's always, to me, been the whiff of an even-more-sinister Major Charles Ingram and Wife about the McCanns - even if they are convicted how much is anyone betting against them not appearing on 'I'm a Celebrity...' in ensuing years, replacing Louise Woodward as the loveable British child-killer.
As we've seen, the Portuguese word aguido means something quite different to how we think of an official "suspect" in this country.
Quake42 said:As to some of the comments that have been made - well, I suspect a lot of people, myself included, had doubts about the parents' story from the start - doubts that were difficult to voice until recently. There's a good, and balanced, article here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article ... 02,00.html
well worth a read.
Dingo Baby Case Woman Backs McCanns
Updated: 11:45, Wednesday September 12, 2007
A woman who was wrongly convicted of murderering her daughter has warned against judging the parents of Madeleine McCann before the full facts of her disappearance are known.
Australian Lindy Chamberlain's daughter Azaria was snatched by a dingo, but she was convicted of the child's murder in 1982 before being exonerated six years later.
She told Australia's Channel Nine Television that police were under tremendous pressure from the public to bring Madeleine's case to a conclusion.
Kate and Gerry McCann have been officially named as suspects by detectives probing the disappearance of their daughter, who was three at the time, from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz.
They have strenuously denied any involvement.
Ms Chamberlain told the channel the McCanns' situation had echoes of the way she was treated.
"The public want answers, and if they haven't got them they are going to invent them," she said.
"And the police are under pressure and have been trained to find answers.
"I certainly wouldn't want to go through it again and be in their shoes."
She added: "There's nothing you can do, but I think as the public, we want to be careful not to run ahead.
"Answers are going to come from somewhere or another - whether it is the right answer is a very worrying problem."
Quake42 said:At the risk of attracting ire from Meryl Streep fans, I have to say I was never *entirely* convinced by Lindy Chamberlain's story either. IIRC, the official line was an open verdict on the baby's death.
rynner said:DNA hope offered to the McCanns
The inventor of DNA fingerprinting has offered to act as an expert witness in the Madeleine McCann case.
Sir Alec Jeffreys said DNA matches alone did not establish guilt and all Madeleine's genetic characters would be found in at least one family member.
I presume the fund was set up to help with the costs of searching for their daughter (employing detectives to follow leads and sightings etc), and I believe it was also to be used so that the McCanns could continue their stay in Portugal as long as possible and keep their case in the news, and in the minds of the Portuguese police.Kondoru said:So just what are they going to do with all that money then?
Peripart said:Having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if some of these "celebrity" lawyers mentioned are working for the McCanns for nothing, in order to keep their own profiles high. Whatever the ultimate outcome of any court case, I'm sure that the lawyers would be working on the basis that there's no such thing as bad publicity.
Peripart said:On that note, where's Max Clifford in all this? He usually pops up if a soap star twists their ankle, but I've seen nothing of him in ages...
Timble2 said:What he was saying that DNA alone couldn't prove guilt or innocence, it's to do with context and with the sensitivity of the tests now available, whether the amount of DNA found at the site could have come from accidental contact via a intermediate carrier.
In the current case, if there's only a tiny amount of DNA from a single spot in the car boot, it could be argued it's accidental transfer from a toy, or piece of clothing. If there's traces from lots of sites in the boot, or a large concentration, or as has been alleged hairs or body fluids, the story looks rather different.
I notice that a couple of the papers today are claiming that Madeleine's body has been dumped at sea. I'm surprised that the possiblity of her having been taken by someone aboard a boat, wasn't considered earlier.
Timble2 said:I notice that a couple of the papers today are claiming that Madeleine's body has been dumped at sea. I'm surprised that the possiblity of her having been taken by someone aboard a boat, wasn't considered earlier. Or perhaps it has and the story simply hasn't leaked before.
I'm surprised that the possiblity of her having been taken by someone aboard a boat, wasn't considered earlier.
ted_bloody_maul said:jefflovestone said:jimv1 said:This is a very strange case.
Even before the recent allegations, I thought it was inevitable the British press (love 'em) would turn on the family. Only a matter of time.
Actually, in an unexpected development - at least from my point of view - today I realised I fancied Kate McCann. :!: :?: :!: :?:
It's that suggestion of her being a 'bad' girl that does it. I fell for Louise Woodward and Maxine Carr in the same way.