Stormkhan
Disturbingly familiar
- Joined
- May 28, 2003
- Messages
- 8,650
morningstar667 said:Are we not men?
We are Devo!
morningstar667 said:Are we not men?
graylien said:But until that day when the saucer is completed and wheeled out for its first test flight, I really don't see the point of continuing with this repetitious and ill-tempered debate. Who gains?
Not necessarily - the whole thing could just drag on interminably and saucer-less Capricorn-like until no one can possibly bring themselves to give a fuck any more ....... or Human could just become increasinly messianic until they shoot him full of thorazine.One inevitable fact remains. Once the saucer is built, it will either fly or it won't. If it does fly, then the sceptics will have to eat their words. If it doesn't fly, then I'm sure Mr 84 will be honest and mature enough to admit that he was mistaken.
GadaffiDuck said:Perhaps we should start a thread regarding Ringo's point. He feels that way, Avlin left on similar grounds and I have made a point too about censure ship and 'the mutual back slapping' brigade. This will be a contentious issue and will provoke angry posts - but we are adults and perhaps we do need a harder edge?
Like with long tweezers?:lol:Bishops, fruitcake abductees, and the tediously PC are to be handled with care.
Human_84 said:Drastically higher water levels along with intense and extended quakes and tremors will likely eliminate most people. From what I know, to live would be to flip a coin and have it stopping on its edge. Meanwhile, this rumbling sets the ships engine in motion and we board.
Nope -that's fine. rationale to follow.Ringo_ said:OK, Stu, I will paraphrase my very angry and honest post into a PC one.
.....
If this is still against guidelines, please delete it because if I can't say what is above then I do not want to post here anymore.
For about the 50th time, you can debate as hard as you like. You can point at an idea and state "I think this is fucking ludicrous" (in those very words). What we contend is that you don't have to point at the person proposing said ideas and say "You're a deluded tit." Anyone with half a brain will come to such a conclusion, if it's that obvious, without someone patronisingly insisting on highlighting it for them.theyithian said:GadaffiDuck said:Perhaps we should start a thread regarding Ringo's point. He feels that way, Avlin left on similar grounds and I have made a point too about censure ship and 'the mutual back slapping' brigade. This will be a contentious issue and will provoke angry posts - but we are adults and perhaps we do need a harder edge?
We've been there. Save your breath. The logic runs: hard debate dissuades new posters who are potential readers of and subscribers to the magazine and keep the board fresh. Bishops, fruitcake abductees, and the tediously PC are to be handled with care.
Words like 'lifeblood of the board' will be used.
We can't play hardball with the deluded i'm afraid.
For about the 50th time, you can debate as hard as you like.
stuneville said:For about the 50th time, you can debate as hard as you like. You can point at an idea and state "I think this is fucking ludicrous" (in those very words).
Thank you for that.GadaffiDuck said:I would suggest that in future you state it was for the thousandth time. One thousand in the latin language is 'M'.
That is, used by a moderator. Whilst moderating.Mighty_Emperor said:Although I would like point out that while swearing is both big and clever it only works when used in moderation (so if in doubt leave it out).
Ringo_ said:OK, Stu, I will paraphrase my very angry and honest post into a PC one.
I feel that Human_84 delivers his argument in a very patronising and condecending manner leaving me and many others frustrated by his posts.
The amount of information being offered is miniscule, masked behind pseudo-scientific claptrap which whist I'm sure impressed him when Hamel said it, does not impress level headed adults. In my first post I suggested this was due to an over active imagination and needing a sense of belonging to something.
I resent having to repeat myself. I only do so to highlight that the original post was not merely a vicious jibe. I have no ill feelings towards Human_84, I'm sure he is a very nice chap, I just take exception at being talked to and treated like an idiot.
Yeah, dead is good, if it avoids all the clap-trap.Dingo667 said:I won't ask anymore. No point. Let him fly off with his alien mates or whatever, even if we all die down here it won't matter because we won't really know 'cause we'll be all dead. :cross eye
The plot of a certain dull movie springs to mindwembley8 said:"Drastically higher water levels along with intense and extended quakes and tremors will likely eliminate most people."
As end-of-the-world scenarios go it's a but dull (and what's the rationale, anyway? Presumably nothing that geologists could detect).
Stormkhan said:Perhaps he's accidentally psychically linked himself to some of the themed rides at Disneyworld.
I tried; tried to answer all the questions and you have shown me that my answers won’t be sufficient. I've been telling you what I know, but, being sure nothing is compromised in the process.
As this started out, if you remember, the first dozen pages were almost complete ridicule towards myself. Everyone thought this information given was totally fabricated, and they'd be a monkey's uncle if I had any real connection to what I spoke of. Those drastic viewpoints have been solidly proven off-base. As for patronizing, the only person in these entire 32 pages that has been patronized is I, on a constant basis. Some of you, can be very inspiring at times.