Funnily enough, I was literally just thinking about this. No doubt the filmmakers will - yet again - make those gentlemen far more snooty and harrumphing than James ever did in the first instance. I mean, they are clearly of a certain social background, but generally far more even handed and affable than later adaptations allow. (Worth pointing out that, in the original, The Mezzotint's protagonist asks for the opinion of a college servant upon the matter of the picture in question - an action which later adaptations render unlikely, given their tendency to add exclusivity and aloofness to the main characters; I also seem to recall that the protagonist in the not so long ago adaptation of Number 13 was a stuffy and rude arse with little resemblance to the rather garrulous original.)
And if it's any consolation, when they are in fact present, James' women - whether servants or served - are almost always right, and more than capable of holding their own in the face of contradiction. As also, in fact, are virtually all his working class characters of either sex.
I've been listening to an awful lot of classic ghost stories recently - having discovered the excellent Bitesized Audio Classics on YouTube. Great fun - but one of the things I've learned from the experience is how good James really was compared to so many other genre writers of the late Victorian and Edwardian era, and also - surprising given much of the criticism levelled at him - how even handed, in comparison, he is as an author towards the less advantaged. And that includes female authors of (roughly) the period.
With the proviso that he needs to be seen within the context of era and genre, I think James is much more balanced in his approach to women than he is given credit for, even compared some well-known female writers of the genre, who could be much more snooty and condescending to members of their own sex than James ever was, and some of whom tended to lapse into the same clichés as their male counterparts: women being either gobby slatterns who were no better than they should be, or radiant innocents who would likely die of the bloody flux should they inadvertently glimpse their own private parts.
Unless they are clearly a bad lot – as in Karswell’s household - servants are never insulted, belittled, or mistrusted (or, in the latter case, when they are, the mistrust is shown to be misplaced, and acknowledged as such by the protagonist – it always ends up being about their fallibility, not anyone else's).
There are definitely some broad strokes used, and some comic value squeezed out of these characters (usually based around language and the use thereof) – but never, it seems to me, at the cost of anyone’s dignity. And although not drawn in any depth – these are short stories after all – there is often enough to suggest that the individuals involved have as much of an inner life as the dusty academics they cross paths with. They might be clichés – to a certain extent all the characters are – but none of them seem to me to be of the worst or laziest types. To my mind James had a Dickensian sympathy with them – he didn’t put them on a pedestal, but they definitely get a better billing than, for instance, Conan Doyle who – if he was anything like his main characters – was a crashing snob when it came to anyone below a certain social standing. And Lovecraft – my God, a man who clearly and utterly despised the tired the poor and the huddled masses. And, while we’re at it, compare James’ protagonists to the arrogant know-all Carnacki (and, to a certain extent, Blackwood’s John Silence); the former are much more fallible and human - and indeed humane - their author, I firmly believe, much more self aware.
Nothing better than seeing some pompous academic coming out of their ivory tower and then getting the crap scared out of themI like the respected voice artist Peter Yearsley's readings of readings of James' stories. He does all the voices beautifully, including women and servants/yokels/tram staff and so on, and his normal voice and accent are used for the narration.
Posh people get boring on TV. The demons and ghouls can have them.
Phew thanks for the warning!If you have a 'Ustreme' membership you can watch a 'Jethro' special from tomorrow (Christmas Day) which is a compilation of all the various bits of work Jethro did with/for Jim Davidson and others.
I’ve just seen a potted review and the Netflix trailer for Aranyak, an lndian murder mystery with supernatural overtones: An unlikely partnership of two mismatched police officers, investigating a murder which might have been committed by a wereleopard…
I was tempted to give them a read because I've heard so much about them down the years, they are compelling, but my goodness I was glad to finish them. A lot of his nastiness can be put down to the physical pain he was in throughout his life, but it doesn't excuse it all. The last few years are a countdown to his inevitable suicide, it's that cheery. He was a talented man, but the book reminds you talent doesn't make you a nice guy. Although sometimes the entries are perfectly pleasant and generous. I suppose they call that mercurial.
There was a documentary about him on Channel 5 a couple of weeks ago, to keep it on topic.
This (the original version_ has long been my go-to 'Most Christmassiest Film Ever', but it's rarely shown nowadays. Glad to see it's been remade, although, not having Sky, the remake may well remain a mystery to me.If people have access to Sky Max The Amazing Mr Blunden is very good. Just up my street, a big old house and time travel now that is Christmas.
Anyone's meticulously-kept and soul-baringly honest diaries would be a miserable read though. Especially if their sexuality was illegal and they also had a chronic painful medical condition that made expressing it even more difficult.I was tempted to give them a read because I've heard so much about them down the years, they are compelling, but my goodness I was glad to finish them. A lot of his nastiness can be put down to the physical pain he was in throughout his life, but it doesn't excuse it all. The last few years are a countdown to his inevitable suicide, it's that cheery. He was a talented man, but the book reminds you talent doesn't make you a nice guy. Although sometimes the entries are perfectly pleasant and generous. I suppose they call that mercurial.
There was a documentary about him on Channel 5 a couple of weeks ago, to keep it on topic.
Anyone's meticulously-kept and soul-baringly honest diaries would be a miserable read though. Especially if their sexuality was illegal and they also had a chronic painful medical condition that made expressing it even more difficult.
I felt grudgingly sorry for Williams, a satisfactorily complicated response.
Thanks for the heads-up! Series set to record!Starting at 8pm (GMT) tonight on Talking Pictures TV, the original series of 'The Outer Limits' from S1E1.
First broadcast in 1963, episode 1 is "The Galaxy Being" about a TV engineer who inadvertently contacts aliens while experimenting on a 3D television.
I liked the effect they used with the alien - it was actually a bloke in a rubber suit but then they got a little creative and coated it in glycerine, then created a negative of the image and superimposed it onto the film.Well I don't recall ever seeing that episode before and it didn't disappoint!
I was actually really rather surprised at the high production values. It was quite obviously filmed with high quality equipment as the pictures were 'pin sharp' (now, this was broadcast in 1963 remember), and the SFX were carried out with some care and expertise.
No shonky, wobbly, cardboard sets, or hastily glued together models hanging on visible wires with flames coming out of them which were clearly at the wrong scale (cough, cough, "Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D" filmed 3 years later)
There are board members that might do that for you if you ask them nicely.a bloke in a rubber suit (...) coated it in glycerine
I've heard about the Weird Weekends...There are board members that might do that for you if you ask them nicely.
That's the first sign.I personally am finding it quite compulsive viewing.
S1E2 was on last night.Starting at 8pm (GMT) tonight on Talking Pictures TV, the original series of 'The Outer Limits' from S1E1.
First broadcast in 1963, episode 1 is "The Galaxy Being" about a TV engineer who inadvertently contacts aliens while experimenting on a 3D television.
The scene were the guy gets his putty face messed around with was seriously creepy.S1E2 was on last night.
Another good story about an Oriental plot to takeover the US by replacing the President and other key figures with imposters that have been altered to look identical using a special serum that allows human flesh to moulded into a new shape.
And don't worry about it being old and in black and white - you soon forget that.
If people have access to Sky Max The Amazing Mr Blunden is very good. Just up my street, a big old house and time travel now that is Christmas.