Tyger Lily said:Nope, geniune light bulbs a la B&Q.
Have a rehearsal tonight so will do some discreet detective work.
get any where with this tyger?
Tyger Lily said:Nope, geniune light bulbs a la B&Q.
Have a rehearsal tonight so will do some discreet detective work.
spillage said:LOL! My thoughts exactly!
It was quite cheeky wasn't it?
I also think it's a load of bollocks suggesting someone who doesn't believe that psychological sensations are the result of being touched by "Baby Jesus" etc are lacking in some form of "Normal" function or part of the brain.
That's downright nasty.
But I don't suggest that people who are conservative natured have part of their brains missing!
"God Blind"....Now that has to be arrogant!
I find both your posts intriguing. I guess I really don't have an epiphany and I don't really adhere to any particular religion. Me, I've always sensed that an intelligence permeates the Universe and that this intelligence can individuate at times. I suppose if you wanted to call this intelligence (or consciousness) "God" that would be fine by me. I always viewed it as Satan myself. I swear I don't say this to be disagreeable or confrontational (and I don't call myself a Satanist - that seems so petty to me) but even as a kid I felt that it was this flow of consciousness - this constant of change - that the Devil truely represented. I guess I always liked him better than that grumpy old Yaweh/Jehovah. Also, I can remember being in school and learning about how primitive peoples believed there was a soul incarnate in even inanimate objects and saying to myself "Oh yeah, I know what they're talking about. " Replace the word "soul" with "consciousness" and that's basically my outlook. Does that make me an animist? :hmm:Austen said:I would be fascinated to hear what the religious epiphanies of Muslims, Hindus, Pagans, Buddists etc are like. Most faiths seem to have them.
mah said:get any where with this tyger?
Bannik said:I always viewed it as Satan myself. I swear I don't say this to be disagreeable or confrontational (and I don't call myself a Satanist - that seems so petty to me) but even as a kid I felt that it was this flow of consciousness - this constant of change - that the Devil truely represented.
I say "Satan" because I raised a Catholic and so that's the name which is more ingrained in me. I suppose I could say "Pan" or even "Shiva" as they seem to me to represent the same thing - expansiveness and unboundedness. It's just that I wasn't raised a Pagan or a Hindu so those names don't hold the same sentimental value to me. "Devil" is just the word I seem to fall back on. I really don't see the Devil as "evil." Nature is both beautiful and deadly, but niether good nor bad. I don't go around calling myself a "Satanist" and the only time I share these views is on this mb or with trusted friends and relatives with open minds, so I've never really had any problems stemming from the evil connotations of the word. I find many of the things Jesus had to say quite true ("Before my father I am" - I just love that one ), but I don't call myself a Christian. Labels just seem so limiting to me. Cathar? - I know I've heard of them, I'll have to look them up. I know they were all persectued for something.Austen said:You almost sound like a Cathar to me! Is Satan the name your really looking for (with its implications of evil) or are you thinking more of the pagan horned gods?:devil:
None of your "quotes" in the reply to my message were actually phrases used in my last post, apart from "God blind" which I put into quotes because I realise it is a slightly dodgey phrase.
Originally posted by escargot
Little Magyar pixie, please send back my skating gloves...............