Coastaljames
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2015
- Messages
- 4,044
- Location
- East Norfolk coast
So what left this DNA then? Two experts in the field say primates but not known ones.
I'm going to say an unknown primate then. I don't think that bigfoot is an unknown primate. Thousands of accounts, from all over the world for hundreds of years point towards it not being an unknown primate.
The yeti and almasty make perfect sense as flesh and blood creature there is no need for a 'paranormal' explanation for them.
Yeah, I don't know much about either. What little I know about the Yeti...we have the ancient, animist Himalyan legends of a "Glacial Being". An ape-like humanoid creature...pretty much the same ape-like humanoid creature that the Native Americans and First Nation people called Sasquatch. And the ape-like humanoid creature of medieval European legend, the Woodwose. And the ape-like humanoid creature the Mongols called Almas...I could go on. These ape-like humanoids are everywhere...yet materially nowhere. They are perpetually hidden in the mist, in the snow, in the woods. Ghosts.
On top of that, I, of course think that there are unknown flesh and blood animals there that samples turn up and they get tested and they prove something unknown is out there. I just think automatically deciding it must be a bigfoot, or a yeti, or an almasty, is making a leap that isn't warranted...strikes me as odd - "This comes from an unknown animal...oh wait, it must be from a Yeti then!"...surely it's more likely to come from an unknown type of bear? Or primate? (This is not directly a reply to you @lordmongrove , more to those who follow that path of deduction).