Well, I am both flabbergasted and flattered at the same time. The research for the study listed is from one of the most respected and trustworthy centres in the world. It is Cleveland Ohio, 50 thousand people over a 3 month period. The dosage data listed is from a graph that is in the video, I have no idea how to lift anything or copy anything from a video, sorry. I don't know how you can expect me to give you better answers than they do and yet that's what you asked me to do. I can do this...
Here is the link to the entire study that also includes the graphs, I hope this will be more useful for you.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full
Ok, so I see that I misinterpreted the numbers as percentage of people who contracted Covid. Rather the dose numbers were percentage of people with varying vaccine doses. However, I do question the number of people who tested positive for Covid during the period of study and how some might interpret them.
From article:
“Participants
CCHS employees in employment at any Cleveland Clinic location in Ohio on 12 September 2022, the day the bivalent vaccine first became available to employees, were included in the study. Those for whom age and gender were not available were excluded.”
The way that Covid infection is identified in people is through detection of antibodies for Covid through PCR test. It is very accurate. It is known that people who have been vaccinated will have antibodies present due to the vaccine. It is also common practise, especially in healthcare, that if rapid testing and PCR testing is done as a preventative measure for keeping Covid at bay in workplace, or hospital etc, that those who have recently had a vaccine, report this as they
will show positive for Covid.
This study included people who had just had the bivalent vaccine. The numbers showing the increasing rates of people with antibodies ie those with the greater number of doses, would have had greater chance of more antibodies detected because of the timing of their vaccination and the testing. It does not mean that they had Covid.
What the numbers do reflect is that the further from your infection or vaccination period, the fewer number of antibodies against Covid are detected in your body. This is known. In my opinion, these recently vaccinated people should not have been included in the study as they skew the results.
I think that it would be difficult if not impossible to link more vaccine doses to higher incidences of risk of Covid. If a longer time range of study is done, ie at one year, maybe, but like flu vaccinations, the vaccines only prevent risk of more severe disease, not like measles vaccines which provide lifetime immunity. Our bodies lose immunity, although not entirely to square one, to Covid. This is true in both vaccinated and unvaccinated.