Great article, this stood out for me:
"Several times, I spoke to or heard about pilots who fly various air ambulances and police helicopters who spotted and tracked large cats moving around the fields at night."
We seem to have reached an impasse. Those who live and work in the countryside become 'believers' after an experience or when trusted family or friends have an encounter. However, many of these witnesses do not want publicity or are in jobs whereby making such claims could damage their reputations and careers. Those who live in built-up areas and rarely venture out into the countryside or when they do stick to well-worn paths and designated country parks and thus have an incorrect view of Britain as an urbanised island bereft of 'wilderness' i.e. space for a large canine predator to live and hunt without human interference:
"There are other studies that measure land use in the UK. Following assessments between mid-2009 and early 2011, a report was
published in 2011 by governments and experts from across the UK. It found that “urban areas” made up around 7% of the UK. However, it
reports that in England the majority of urban areas are either greenspace, domestic garden, or rivers, canals, lakes and reservoirs.
They
found that the rest of the UK is composed of enclosed farmland (40%), mountains, moorlands and heaths (18%), woodlands (12%), and the remainder a mix of freshwater, coastal and marine.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) published experimental land use
data for 2010. The data suggests that 12% of UK land is ‘urban and developed’, which would leave 88% for everywhere else. This is
land with homes and other buildings, roads, and urban green space. The rest is agricultural land (65%), forest (13%), marine areas and coastland (2%), and the rest is either freshwater or other types of land."
https://fullfact.org/economy/has-92-country-not-been-built/#:~:text=There%20are%20several%20estimates%20of,”%2C%20using%20data%20from%202012.
Journalists are overwhelmingly in the latter category and so the media coverage is almost universally cynical and this article is a breath of fresh air to be honest.