"Nor I!"I would not guess stuffed toy. Those are really terrible and don't look this detailed.
But the lack of provenance is damning. I'm not buying it.
"Nor I!"I would not guess stuffed toy. Those are really terrible and don't look this detailed.
But the lack of provenance is damning. I'm not buying it.
Not the CFZ, Jon and team would be as skeptical as usOne of the commenters underneath says, and I agree, that the vegetation doesn't remind me of anything particularly native British. It could be anywhere in the world... or in a zoo.
Besides, why be so coy about a 'centre for zoology' ... as another commenter says, maybe the 'centre for fortean zoology'. And they're bound to have photos of alleged ABCs. Doesn't add anything to the credibility, but they're trying to make it seem so.
Sums up ABCs, there are some most reputable witnesses that include a zoo keepers who kept pumas, police officers, gamekeepers who know their badgers from their foxes, deer census takers, estate managers, a school minibus driver etc. Yet still no definitive proof, just some probable escapees and that is why I agree with author and researcher Di Francis when she states that - some post-1977 releases aside - they are as paranormal as the Black Shuck and other big black dogs with glowing eyes. Furthermore, there have been sightings of the black puma-type sin association with UFOs and Bigfoot (in the US). Te problem we have is that the press like ABCs as much as they like UFOs for clickbait and have been having a field day with all these dodgy photos and outright fakes.It's frustrating - you see the headline and a pic that's clearly of a big cat such as a panther, and not the usual slightly big domestic cat or farm moggy.
And then... and then you read the story and all that optimism vanishes in a flash.
No provenance, no provenance, no provenance. The pic could be anywhere at any time, making it a non-story. There could be a story out there, and this could even be it, but not as it stands with that oh-so-flimsy backstory.
And that's soooo frustrating!
The photo was in our archive. It was sent to us in 2012. Karl Shuker found the origional picture that was superimposed on the background, proving it was a composit fake. We did not release this to the press.One of the commenters underneath says, and I agree, that the vegetation doesn't remind me of anything particularly native British. It could be anywhere in the world... or in a zoo.
Besides, why be so coy about a 'centre for zoology' ... as another commenter says, maybe the 'centre for fortean zoology'. And they're bound to have photos of alleged ABCs. Doesn't add anything to the credibility, but they're trying to make it seem so.
Is there a direct link? The ones in your post just link to The Independent and seem to be circular. I cannot view anything other than a thumbnail (is that the correct term?) and if I click on it, it goes back to the main page.Clearest Ever Photo of Big Cat in British Countryside
‘Documentary makers have discovered what they claim is the ‘clearest ever’ photo of a big cat prowling the British countryside.
The picture of the large panther-like creature was discovered in the files of a zoology organization.
It shows a large muscular black cat lying in long grass in Smallthorne, Staffordshire.
The photo was accompanied by a handwritten note dated March 17 - but it is unclear is which year it was taken.
Experts say if genuine it is ‘’probably the best photo of a British big cat that exists’’.
Is this article gone now? It's not connecting and the search shows it but doesn't bring up the original article.Clearest Ever Photo of Big Cat in British Countryside
‘Documentary makers have discovered what they claim is the ‘clearest ever’ photo of a big cat prowling the British countryside.
The picture of the large panther-like creature was discovered in the files of a zoology organization.
It shows a large muscular black cat lying in long grass in Smallthorne, Staffordshire.
The photo was accompanied by a handwritten note dated March 17 - but it is unclear is which year it was taken.
Experts say if genuine it is ‘’probably the best photo of a British big cat that exists’’.
maybe ownership and all that...?Is this article gone now? It's not connecting and the search shows it but doesn't bring up the original article.
They act in the same way as UFO,s and Fairies elusive and enigmatic, even leaving bits of evidence that at first sight looks good, but turns out very mundane.Sums up ABCs, there are some most reputable witnesses that include a zoo keepers who kept pumas, police officers, gamekeepers who know their badgers from their foxes, deer census takers, estate managers, a school minibus driver etc. Yet still no definitive proof, just some probable escapees and that is why I agree with author and researcher Di Francis when she states that - some post-1977 releases aside - they are as paranormal as the Black Shuck and other big black dogs with glowing eyes. Furthermore, there have been sightings of the black puma-type sin association with UFOs and Bigfoot (in the US). Te problem we have is that the press like ABCs as much as they like UFOs for clickbait and have been having a field day with all these dodgy photos and outright fakes.
“It just felt a bit surreal and quite strange that my first thought was 'big cat'. I managed to get my phone out and got a picture just in my hand before it walked along a bit and ran into the woods. "It had a huge tail, which must have been a metre long with some white on the end.”
“We were walking up one of the tracks with wife, son and Labrador when quite far ahead I saw something which I assumed was a dog, but it looked massive. It started walking around slowly then saw me, stood there and looked at me and then started casually walking away.
“I'm quite a calm character so I thought I was seeing things and remained calm as I had my dog and child with me and didn't want to panic them. I thought I was seeing a massive dog but my brain knew it wasn't as it was so bulky at the back end, the rear legs and back end were as bulky as the front end and it looked very powerful and big.
They found a half-eaten deer carcass nearby.
The reverse is also true. One of my recent novels was on this subject - sort of, it featured a reality TV show where the participants have to go and try to find an ABC in the wild. Some of the reviews were quite...vitriolic, shall we say; not on the writing of the book, or even the ridiculousness of having a reality TV show involving this kind of thing. No, what they got cross about was the 'wild goose chase' 'unrealistic' 'silly' search for the ABC. People really did not like the fact that the book featured a creature that they believe not to exist. The fact that the book has the cat appear right at the end just seemed to make them more angry.And it’s got a cohort of true believers who are convinced they are flesh aThend blood, who turn quite nasty when they are questioned
Excellent! You provoked a response.The reverse is also true. One of my recent novels was on this subject - sort of, it featured a reality TV show where the participants have to go and try to find an ABC in the wild. Some of the reviews were quite...vitriolic, shall we say; not on the writing of the book, or even the ridiculousness of having a reality TV show involving this kind of thing. No, what they got cross about was the 'wild goose chase' 'unrealistic' 'silly' search for the ABC. People really did not like the fact that the book featured a creature that they believe not to exist. The fact that the book has the cat appear right at the end just seemed to make them more angry.
Spoilers!The reverse is also true. One of my recent novels was on this subject - sort of, it featured a reality TV show where the participants have to go and try to find an ABC in the wild. Some of the reviews were quite...vitriolic, shall we say; not on the writing of the book, or even the ridiculousness of having a reality TV show involving this kind of thing. No, what they got cross about was the 'wild goose chase' 'unrealistic' 'silly' search for the ABC. People really did not like the fact that the book featured a creature that they believe not to exist. The fact that the book has the cat appear right at the end just seemed to make them more angry.
Well, that's clear as mud. I think that is the worst photo that I've seen posted hereAnother ‘big black cat' - on Dartmoor
And another blurry photo.
The family were walking to Fernworthy Reservoir on August 27 when they encountered the suspected big cat. Jon initially spotted what he believed to be a stray dog. However, after watching the mystery animal move, he realised it more closely resembled a large cat.
View attachment 69262
Whaddaya mean woman? - it’s a puma, plain as day.Well, that's clear as mud. I think that is the worst photo that I've seen posted here
Know Fernworthy well. It is a busy place during the school holidays and I somehow doubt a primarily nocturnal big cat would be wandering around during daytime, waiting to be disturbed by a dog walker. There are plenty of areas not far from there that hardly see a human and with lots of nice trees to hang out in. Sadly deer get attacked by dogs or die of disease and old age and get scavenged by foxes and the like. Or maybe even they found what was left after the patchers had taken the valuable meat and the liver.Another ‘big black cat' - on Dartmoor
And another blurry photo.
The family were walking to Fernworthy Reservoir on August 27 when they encountered the suspected big cat. Jon initially spotted what he believed to be a stray dog. However, after watching the mystery animal move, he realised it more closely resembled a large cat.
View attachment 69262
I am not saying they don't exist they just don't exist in the physical form, they display all the characteristics of UFO's, Fairy's and other monster sightings, I would love to know the meaning behind it all but I haven't got a clue, the flesh and blood advocates would have us believe that we have a thriving population of Black Panthers that are rare in their natural environment, which is pretty ridiculousThe reverse is also true. One of my recent novels was on this subject - sort of, it featured a reality TV show where the participants have to go and try to find an ABC in the wild. Some of the reviews were quite...vitriolic, shall we say; not on the writing of the book, or even the ridiculousness of having a reality TV show involving this kind of thing. No, what they got cross about was the 'wild goose chase' 'unrealistic' 'silly' search for the ABC. People really did not like the fact that the book featured a creature that they believe not to exist. The fact that the book has the cat appear right at the end just seemed to make them more angry.
Yes, I'm not entirely sure why you quoted me - I was illustrating that, just as people get angry about being challenged about the objective reality of ABCs, people also get angry about that reality being assumed.I am not saying they don't exist they just don't exist in the physical form, they display all the characteristics of UFO's, Fairy's and other monster sightings, I would love to know the meaning behind it all but I haven't got a clue, the flesh and blood advocates would have us believe that we have a thriving population of Black Panthers that are rare in their natural environment, which is pretty ridiculous
To me that's the clue that not is all it seems on first glimpse
"Not is all it seems on first glimpse".I am not saying they don't exist they just don't exist in the physical form, they display all the characteristics of UFO's, Fairy's and other monster sightings, I would love to know the meaning behind it all but I haven't got a clue, the flesh and blood advocates would have us believe that we have a thriving population of Black Panthers that are rare in their natural environment, which is pretty ridiculous
To me that's the clue that not is all it seems on first glimpse
It's definitely a worldwide phenomena, it adjusts itself to whatever it want's but more than likely the more ridiculous the better, such as sleek black panthers roaming around the bucolic pastures of the UK, when you stop to think about it you begin to realize all definitely is not what it seems"Not is all it seems on first glimpse".
That is it in a nutshell Robbrent. I have seen a Large Alien Leonid myself and it was as plain as day - I was sitting on top of a rise at my parents property and I saw this animal the colour of a golden labrador, sashay up a shallow gully right next to where I was. Long straight tail held out, short rounded ears, big paws and a stubby defined muzzle with a very muscular leonine walk to it.
I had a .22 with a scope, so I could see quite plainly what it was and it took maybe 40 seconds to walk up that gully, then pass me, into a scrubby section of bush. Plain as day.
I've spoken before about The First Nation's reality, and how their 'Dreaming' walks alongside this reality, as well as the propensity for some Kunyapipi Denizens to merge into this one, and so your suggestion that maybe the ABC just don't exist in a physical form ties in with this 'alternative' reality.
Maybe 'The Dreaming' is worldwide, rather than just Australian?
Who knows...
But why an ABC? If absurdity is the object, then why not appear as a mobile bookcase or a giant pink cow? If blending in, then practically any element of wildlife would do. It's a weird kind of 'real thing, but in an unlikely setting' that reminds me vaguely of Ford Prefect and his attempt to 'blend in'.It's definitely a worldwide phenomena, it adjusts itself to whatever it want's but more than likely the more ridiculous the better, such as sleek black panthers roaming around the bucolic pastures of the UK, when you stop to think about it you begin to realize all definitely is not what it seems
I don't see absurdity as the point. This life is absurd enough. In Australia we have the Corroborree frogs ( Pseudophryne corroboree, and the northern corroboree frog Pseudophryne pengilleyi) that lays it's eggs in a nest made of grass, next to water, and the tadpole of the Corroboree frog doesn't enter water until it metamorphoses. So therefore, I think that existence is to a greater or lesser degree, determined by that which exists.But why an ABC? If absurdity is the object, then why not appear as a mobile bookcase or a giant pink cow? If blending in, then practically any element of wildlife would do. It's a weird kind of 'real thing, but in an unlikely setting' that reminds me vaguely of Ford Prefect and his attempt to 'blend in'.
It's that wonderful ambiguity that the phenomena is noted for, if someone spotted a giant pink cow (other colours are available) most likely people would laugh at them and not take them seriously (some equally bizarre sightings have have been claimed over the years, such as the Liberace UFO )But why an ABC? If absurdity is the object, then why not appear as a mobile bookcase or a giant pink cow? If blending in, then practically any element of wildlife would do. It's a weird kind of 'real thing, but in an unlikely setting' that reminds me vaguely of Ford Prefect and his attempt to 'blend in'.
They are as real as any Fortean phenomena, but do you not think that leaving tracks is all part of the game they play, just like UFO's leaving evidence that leads to nowhere ? The game is as old as the hills didn't the Fairies used to give gold to people but when they returned it turned out to be a pile of dirt?Iv never seen one but been called out to 3 incidents two of which I saw tracks
and that was no pensioners pussy that made them,
I was speaking to a game keeper I know well enough to know he knows what
he has seen and he told me he had been within 4 ft of one, I am as convinced
as you can be without seeing one yourself that they exist and are real.