Gwenar said:
I don't think you're naive
...
it's also good to understand that some nice families may not be as nice as they appear. That some people won't do the right thing unless prodded.
Appreciate your attempt to slap me into being there, Gwenar.
No, I'm not naive, that's why I found the doco so brutal. Here's my original point. There's a documented murder and a documented cover-up with no
subsequent investigation into THE FAMILY. What TF is wrong with US law that me, not being naive, can see that the mother and sister know a bunch more than they're telling, but no law is being enforced to bring them to justice and account for their duplicity. Is this yet another sad-end of political correctness where the 'feelings' of the apparent aggrieved are now seen to be more worthy than bringing them to account in the murder of this youth?
The reason for the family's acceptance of the imposter is worrying though.
This is at the heart of it. I'm not saying they did him in (they may have), but they definitely know what happened. You don't have to be a seasoned detective to see that. It isn't 'the way of the world' that gets to me, it's the offhand response to the obvious by the authorities. The FBI agent is very clear that she is waaaay suspicious of the two, but waht has happened as a result? What about the boy??! It's too open-ended when there are very obvious implications for the family. The facts:
1. The sister coached the imposter from the very beginning - implying that she knew he could not be the boy himslef, and is clearly complicit in the deception of the authorities. No charges laid or investigation entered into.
2. The mother and sister both helped the imposter to settle into their former child's role back in the US as smoothly as they could. Why? Because they wanted to smother any interest in the investigation. If they were really aggrieved and looking for true closure, they would have howled aloud from the outset. They didn't. Therefore there are, as far as I can see, two main motives for their complicity in deception. Either they were too cut up to challenge the imposter (possible), and their desperation for closure drove them to lie to themselves and avoid any further emotional stress (a mental/emotional self-delusion - plausible). Or, they know what happened to their boy and want to protect themselves and the perpetrator from prosecution, and this bloke was a convenient cover allowing them to avoid any further legal snooping.
In my opinion, the second scenario is the most likely. I think it highly likely that the ex-boyfriend killed the boy and disposed of the body with the mother and sister's knowledge, even encouragement. Why is anybody's guess. But they definitely know what happened.