Copying over from a Facebook comment I made on a Fortean group. Now on one level this isn't Fortean at all: there genuinely is a child in a blue top in this photo who was there at the time the photo was taken. Two things make it worthy of inclusion here:
i) the photographer said he had no recollection at all of such a child in the room or in shot, but multiple witnesses stated "No, you're wrong, the child was definitely present along with their parents".
ii) The perspective is odd. You have to really look several times to establish where they physically are in the room: the combination of elements in the photo makes it look as if the kid is both in front of, and behind, the man in the foreground. (he's actually behind the man with outspread arms)
This is a photo taken in the instant of a roomful of dancing people in continual motion: taken an instant later or earlier, everything would have resolved itself in normality and it would be unremarkable. I'm wondering if at least some "ghost" pictures could be explained in terms of things like this - you could have taken a hundred shots of this ever-changing dynamic scene, each capturing a fleeting instant of frozen motion, and only this one captures something (explicably) odd. The photographer maintains he had no recollection of a child in a blue top being present (but other evidence says the child was there). This is backed by this one frozen instant looking just odd and weird to the eye - but explicable by folds of loose clothing obscuring the detail and tricking the eye, in a crucial instant.
A ghost picture that never was?
View attachment 70680