It might be worth saying that when she requested her account be deleted a year or so previously over a minor disagreement with another poster, we did not do so; we counselled her to take a breather (because we
all have moments where small things irritate us irrationally).
I was often 'tapped on the shoulder' by moderators over the years, usually by
@stu neville diplomatically telling me to give the rules lawyering a break because it was giving the mods a headache. Did this irritate me? A little. Did I flounce? No, though a few days' break sometimes felt wise.
If, as ChasFink says, you want to be a part of a community (as opposed to just 'posting stuff') there is a small amount of give and take required; and it really is a pretty small amount here—unless you have insufficient control over your own behaviour.
We even try to take real-world factors into account (those we know about) when addressing those splashing in the pool, but some people among us pretty much think they should be able to post anything anywhere 'Because it's important'.
I honestly think you'd simply be ejected without consultation by a great many other online communities if you pulled some of the stunts a few long-term members have pulled here over the years.
Being honest, as far as I can see on the public side, Ronnie Jersey was aggrieved because she liked Trev's jokes and his regurgiation of right-wing talking points that chimed with her own views about U.S. immigration. We are not interested in hosting 'any-wing' views on immigration, and if two medium-term members are the cost of maintaining that stance, we (I think I speak for he other mods) think it's a sound investment.