>Dingo667: "So many they are more tangible than we might think."
I agree. It is not normal that so many GOOD studies (like, for example, studies of Stella LANSING's psychic photographs) are not followed by more inquiries. But a difficulty with paranormal manifestations is that, if one tries to have a closer look, they stop to manifest. After the study of an impressive UFO ground mark at Trans-en-Provence, and other effects left by the CE2 "amaranth" case, scientists from the GEPAN/SEPRA expected others to follow. So they could confront results. But they never came. So disappointment and discouragement ensued. Adding fuel to the skeptics.
>Timble2:
But if they have so many possible origins, or are let on the loose, this should be a cacophony. You missed the point of the demonstration. I don't see why they should all obey to the same rule by themselves, because there is no natural trend towards it. A large array of non-human intelligences should be as disparate in behaviour as humans are. In fact, they should be more, because some would display behaviours our brains couldn't understand. So this golden rule of elusiveness must be enforced. I read an article in Scientific American (sorry I forgot the name of its author) which tried to adress this enigma: if there are many alien intelligences visiting us, the lack of direct contact is inexplicable. It is easy to imagine that an alien species is bound by an ethic rule proscribing direct intervention on the course of another civilisation. But that it developped such a moral sense during its evolution is only a possibility among others. There is no reason that it is required to travel among the stars (humanity itself shows little signs of becoming better) -of course, it applies to beings from different dimensions too. If there are many visitors, it is unavoidable that we would be visited, sooner or later, by a number of them following a different ethic. Some should be more openly hostile, others would look for a direct contact. Maybe some are indifferent, and pass only above our skies. But even they are bound by this rule of non intervention and remain hidden; if they were absolutely indifferent, we could easily spot and observe them.
Maybe visitors (or Gaea-like entities) are very rare, it would be easier for them to reach this goal of a same attitude towards Earth and humanity, by a mere agreement. If they are numerous, an enforcing structure would be more probably needed. I deduce that there is such one, and it is efficient: because if there are rogues and outlaws, their influence is very limited. Otherwise we would have much greater knowledge of paranormal phenomena...
I agree. It is not normal that so many GOOD studies (like, for example, studies of Stella LANSING's psychic photographs) are not followed by more inquiries. But a difficulty with paranormal manifestations is that, if one tries to have a closer look, they stop to manifest. After the study of an impressive UFO ground mark at Trans-en-Provence, and other effects left by the CE2 "amaranth" case, scientists from the GEPAN/SEPRA expected others to follow. So they could confront results. But they never came. So disappointment and discouragement ensued. Adding fuel to the skeptics.
>Timble2:
But if they have so many possible origins, or are let on the loose, this should be a cacophony. You missed the point of the demonstration. I don't see why they should all obey to the same rule by themselves, because there is no natural trend towards it. A large array of non-human intelligences should be as disparate in behaviour as humans are. In fact, they should be more, because some would display behaviours our brains couldn't understand. So this golden rule of elusiveness must be enforced. I read an article in Scientific American (sorry I forgot the name of its author) which tried to adress this enigma: if there are many alien intelligences visiting us, the lack of direct contact is inexplicable. It is easy to imagine that an alien species is bound by an ethic rule proscribing direct intervention on the course of another civilisation. But that it developped such a moral sense during its evolution is only a possibility among others. There is no reason that it is required to travel among the stars (humanity itself shows little signs of becoming better) -of course, it applies to beings from different dimensions too. If there are many visitors, it is unavoidable that we would be visited, sooner or later, by a number of them following a different ethic. Some should be more openly hostile, others would look for a direct contact. Maybe some are indifferent, and pass only above our skies. But even they are bound by this rule of non intervention and remain hidden; if they were absolutely indifferent, we could easily spot and observe them.
Maybe visitors (or Gaea-like entities) are very rare, it would be easier for them to reach this goal of a same attitude towards Earth and humanity, by a mere agreement. If they are numerous, an enforcing structure would be more probably needed. I deduce that there is such one, and it is efficient: because if there are rogues and outlaws, their influence is very limited. Otherwise we would have much greater knowledge of paranormal phenomena...