It's somewhat similar to someone posting a picture of a bird type that's unknown in whatever country it's been visiting. Either someone calls fake or it's so blurry and dreadful that you can't tell if it's a bird or a lens smear.
Reminds me of when someone found the image that had been use to fake the Wem town hall fire photo.
Yes! That photo had featured in t'mag an' everythin'.
I would have sworn it was a UFO pursued by a fairy.
Insect near the camera.
That’s what I thought it was going to be. But I’ve seen enough of them it doesn’t look like that. Slower for a start. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a fake.
Has it been proved to be a fake though?
From memory, the finder stumbled across a postcard reproduction being sold in a market (or something similar) in the same town in this instance that had an identical image of that little girl that had clearly been photoshopped or dark room manipulated onto the Wen town hall fire photo? .. excellent arm chair detective work and kudos to that person.
Angel. Deffo. No other explanation.
Right. Cheers. Just down the road from me.
I can't watch the video (it won't load, my speeds are too woeful I suspect), but I read snippets and wondered why on earth the deceased father would manefest by flying past a Ring doorbell camera as an 'angel' rather than - if we suppose that the dead can return to visit their grieving relatives - not appearing as himself and removing any doubt?
I could easily get over there and
I liked Wem the first time I went, but it had a very foreboding presence the second time. Could have just been the weather I suppose.
And the actor Peter Vaughan who starred in the tv adaptation of Warning to the Curious by M.R.James.A branch of my family comes from the area.
Explains a lot.
Well there we go!
And as Grouty he only appeared in three episodes (and the 1979 film).And Grout in Porridge.
And an Australian landowner with a shady past in Shelock Holmes' "Boscombe Valley Mystery".
Make of that what you will.
It looks very much likes a bird, specifically a dove, taking off. The figure looks large in comparison to the car, but we don't know the relative distances between the blur, the car and the camera, nor which thing, car or blur, is in the foreground.
I’m no expert with these things but to me it looks like the movement of the “angel” mirrors the movement of the people walking towards the camera, even when they enter the doorway. Could it be come kind of distorted mirror image reflection on the convex glass in front of the lens?
